Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: And who said the F-4 Phantom is obsolete?

  1. #21

    Default

    https://aviastar.org/index2.html

    Lockheed made lots of planes we know but it looks like everything Northrup made was an experiment.
    We had an A-7 park at our hanger. While I was on night guard duty I climbed inside the intake and crawled all the way to the back just for fun.
    Last edited by dryheat; 03-21-2023 at 06:51.
    If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    9,256

    Default

    There is a difference between "obsolete" and "obsolescent." Obsolescent (meaning more modern and efficient stuff is available) equipment can still be quite useful. For example MiG 17 and 19 aircraft, both clearly obsolescent in the 1960s gave us a good bit of trouble in the Viet Nam war. As late as the Gulf War Phantoms, while not used by us much in their original role did good service for us in the "Wild Weasel" electronic warfare mode.

    The Phantom remained in US frontline service from 1961 to 1996, that's 35 years, an almost unequalled record for a fighter aircraft. The Japanese just retired their Phantoms in 2021!! A remarkable record and one of histories great aircraft.
    Last edited by Art; 03-22-2023 at 07:41.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •