Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 25
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    2,194

    Default

    Yeah I have no clue on the Remington. I've never seen another one, not that registers anyway.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    2,194

    Default

    The only idea I really have is, I've seen where companies would take random pieces off the line and check/test them. Maybe some random test piece where they checked a batch for hardness? That would be my honest best guess. But I have nothing to back it up.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,275

    Default

    I have documentation firmly establishing that the punch mark in front of the serial number is a USMC trait. I am aware, however, that a few early Remington rifles also have a punch mark in front of the serial number. In those cases, the meaning of the punch mark is unknown.

    But one final word of precaution. All it takes is a hammer, a punch, a strong arm, and nefarious intent to make the mark. So the punch mark is no conclusive indication of USMC issuance.

    J.B.
    Last edited by John Beard; 04-28-2016 at 09:00.

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MoMallard View Post
    Pulling some clunker/parts guns out that I'd accumulated and happened to notice something for the first time. This RIA receiver had a punch mark in front of the serial. It also has a very small prick punch on the right receiver rail and a hatcher hole. I had taken this picture a while back just to document for the database, so don't have any more readily available without pulling out the camera. It's sitting in a log wood scant stock with an RIA 1919 barrel, Remington bolt, and so on. Attachment 35390
    According to my notes, I inspected your rifle at the CMP on 11 Oct 2006 and recorded it as a USMC rifle. It had a different barrel in those days.

    J.B.
    Last edited by John Beard; 04-28-2016 at 09:04.

  5. #15

    Default

    Thanks John and everyone else. Guess at this point all I can do with it is say "yay, it's a USMC receiver". I had originally intended it for a sporter project since it had a tomato stake barrel and a hatcher hole and had lost it's "originality", but I don't want to bubba up a USMC receiver.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MoMallard View Post
    Thanks John and everyone else. Guess at this point all I can do with it is say "yay, it's a USMC receiver". I had originally intended it for a sporter project since it had a tomato stake barrel and a hatcher hole and had lost it's "originality", but I don't want to bubba up a USMC receiver.
    Do you have the original barrel that was in it when I inspected it at the CMP? Just curious.

    J.B.

  7. #17

    Default

    What was the barrel date from your notes? I didn't keep a lot of notes on some of the early guns I had. I may have gotten it from CMP South for parts/receivers. I still have every 03 I have bought, so it may be sitting on one of the early project guns. I recall changing one AV-19 barrel that I still have stashed somewhere.

  8. #18

    Default

    Bet that was it. I looked at the AV-19 barrel and it has vice marks on it. D****it! I think I remember that gun now. I got it for the tight AV barrel to put on my CMP shooter and was going to use the receiver to built up a .257 Roberts deer rifle, since in my rookie opinion, the Hatcher hole ruined the receiver from a collector standpoint, and it was a "parts gun" so I wasn't doing anything bad. Heck, it even had one of those crappy, might be dangerous due to mfg process AV barrels that were derided! I put the barrel on a C stocked 924K receiver and shot it in some CMP matches. It shot great, but had a bad ring in the chamber that made extraction a pain in rapid. SO....later on, I sent that in to the CMP to build me a Vintage Sniper rifle with a brand new Criterion barrel. They pulled the rear sight sleeve and front sight sleeve for the Criterion. I have a stripped Marine AV barrel that they sent back.

    This is a great example of how a rookie who had about a thimble full of 1903 knowledge took a verified USMC rifle and screwed it up because he didn't know what he had. After 10 years of haunting this and other sights, reading all things 03, and from associating with and emailing knowledgeable folk, I at least have a hatful of knowledge now. Enough to look back and wish for a time machine to go and slap an exuberant but stupid younger man who took something out of the collector world. Anybody got a Faberge egg they want me to smash?

  9. #19

    Default

    That's a good story. Can you take a few photos of that barrel and post them?

  10. #20

    Default

    ARRRGGGHHHHH! It's getting worse. This discourse made me start trying to remember everything about that gun. It was a decade ago. I recalled a punch stippled butt plate that came back to my foggy memory from stripping that gun down. At the time, I didn't think twice about it. Just thought it was some bored GI thing. I don't have it now, as I remembered giving that stock to a buddy. I called him up, and yes. It had a stippled butt plate. God help me. I need a beer.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •