Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    North Texas
    Posts
    149

    Default Inconsistency between TE & MW?

    I come across a mid-50's SA barrel that gage's 5.5 TE and 1.5 MW.

    Is the high TE inconsistent with the low MW on this barrel regarding rounds fired?

    If the 5.5 TE is indeed excessive for having a 1.5 MW, would this be more likely to result from the chamber originally being cut to large?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oceanside, Ca
    Posts
    5,863

    Default

    From what I've read, MW is more a function of troops using a segmented cleaning rod, sans bore guide, then the number of rounds fired. TE can indicate heavy, steady usage, OR mean that it's been heavily used in rapid fire training.
    "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ntex2000 View Post
    I come across a mid-50's SA barrel that gage's 5.5 TE and 1.5 MW.

    Is the high TE inconsistent with the low MW on this barrel regarding rounds fired?

    If the 5.5 TE is indeed excessive for having a 1.5 MW, would this be more likely to result from the chamber originally being cut to large?
    A consideration may be that it may be an abused barrel; repeatedly fired to the point that the hand guards were smoking. That sort of thing shows up worst and foremost in the chamber throat Several years ago a friend of mine inherited the 98K that his father had brought back from Europe at the end of WWII. His father had managed to keep the gun hidden from his family and it went undiscovered until his estate was being settled. It had the capture papers with it still. He brought it too me because it was key holing at 25yds. This was a mystery as the gun "matched" and looked to be next to new. I discovered that there was nearly a full inch of "jump" ahead of the chamber. As a NOS Israeli GI 308 barrel was available it was decided to have it re-barreled. I took the original barrel and split it with a band saw to see what the area immediately ahead of the chamber looked like. As suspected, it was simply burnt out. The rest of the barrel interior looked perfect. I can't imagine what terror the German that used it was experiencing to feel the need to fired it so intensely. In my mind I picture some scared to death 16 or 17 year old kid banging away in the general direction at some Allied enemy; maybe as part of a forlorn rear guard action.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Southern Indiana and Illinois
    Posts
    281

    Default

    It is not unusual for 1950's Springfield barrels to have a new TE reading of around 2.0 when new unfired.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •