Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15
  1. Default All opinions welcome

    I'm retired from gunsmithing and going through boxes of parts and pieces this question came to mind. If a bare receiver was found that the S/N showed a provenance such as a surrender piece from the war on the plains linking it to a well known or famous battle would the receiver be of value left as is or be of greater collector value as an assembled rifle using correct parts to the original configuration. Of course the rifle would be described as an assembly piece and not passed off as original. This is taking into account that a "C" is not stamped on the underside. I did once encounter a Bannerman with a condemned receiver many years ago and I should have examined it closer to see why. I am just curious to see what opinions everyone has.

  2. #2

    Default

    Your point about not building up something, which might wind up being fired someday, using "C" parts is quite laudable - no questions there. As to the historical thing, you will get divided opinions. The problem being that - even if you are honest and somehow mark the piece - what may happen down the road? At first of course the assembly will look too "fresh", but give it a few years of rust/sweat/dirt and the picture gets murky.

    I have some minor wants of the type that might be found in old cigar boxes or coffee cans, do you have a list, or should I just message you?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oceanside, Ca
    Posts
    5,863

    Default

    I would leave the part as-is. Nothing wrong with noting it's provenance, which should kick the price above that of "just a bare receiver". But as Dick points out, assemble it and some time in the future it will be presented as the real deal.
    "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

  4. #4

    Default

    Trap,

    If you build that one up, put a note under the buttplate saying who you are and how that weapon came to be.

    Whatever you decide, good luck!

    jn

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jon_norstog View Post
    Trap,

    If you build that one up, put a note under the buttplate saying who you are and how that weapon came to be.

    Whatever you decide, good luck!

    jn
    On the right track, but not permanent - I'd stamp the date of conversion on the bottom of the barrel.

  6. Default

    I don't have anything of provenance along the trapdoor line. I would think a brass inlay in the stock to ID what transpired in restoring the arm to a complete state would be in order. I just wondered what everyone's thoughts are on the subject because to me it would seem to be of more interest to view a complete rifle rather than a bare receiver. Don't get me wrong - I have the same desire for making money as everyone else, but in the case of a historical piece I would let it go to a museum or to a collection of some type.
    I have only seen one receiver in my life that was stamped with the "C" on the underside. It was in the late 50's at a pawn shop where trapdoors were stuffed in a barrel and marked 15.00$ each and 5.00$ for rifle without stock. I'm surprised the receiver made it out of the armory, but the barrel of rifles was marked Bannerman Trapdoor's as I remember. Carbine's were bringing 30.00$ and there were not many there. I'm going all on memory here and the prices are what I seem to remember.
    Dick, I will go out to my shop and copy the S/N's of the receivers I have ... how did you know my receivers are in cigar boxes and related parts in coffee cans? It must be a practice endemic to our type of personality. I don't have any qualms about posting the S/N's for all to see. They have been tucked away in cigar boxes from a time before Cuban cigars were banned for sale. A few of the receivers I have were put on the back burner for a build. I'm willing to haggle a bit if there is something we both need.

  7. Default

    Here is what I have found so far: A 50-70 with S/N 21169 stamped on left front of receiver and a small 'x' stamped on bottom.
    S/N 61291 with MASS stamped at front of receiver. Capital 'F' stamped on bottom. It has a slight dent on the right nose where I assume was made when someone removed the barrel.
    S/N 3416 with capital 'F' stamped on bottom. Appears to have traces of color case remaining which seems a bit odd.
    I have a few others that I will post as soon as my cleaning and organizing allows me to find them!

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oceanside, Ca
    Posts
    5,863

    Default

    I have a few others that I will post as soon as my cleaning and organizing allows me to find them!

    I put stuff where I always know I can find it.

    Then I can't.
    "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

  9. #9

    Default

    Ahh yes - the (in)famous "I'll put it right here so I'll always know where it is" syndrome - I know it (all too) well!

  10. Default

    How true - seems my cigar boxes have been busy reproducing over the years. Found it!
    S/N 240402
    And a 50/70 S/N 46130

Similar Threads

  1. Yet another SRS check and opinions please!
    By MichaelMorris in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-29-2014, 02:32
  2. SRS check and opinions
    By MichaelMorris in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-22-2014, 08:58
  3. SRS check and opinions!
    By MichaelMorris in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 04-23-2014, 08:25
  4. Stevens 520-30 opinions
    By ww2imposter in forum Military Shotguns
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-29-2013, 02:03
  5. Bayonet opinions
    By MichaelMorris in forum Knife and Bayonet
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-09-2012, 09:51

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •