Results 1 to 10 of 23

Threaded View

  1. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 5MadFarmers View Post
    No idea why people make stuff up when they post. One would think it'd be easier to just check.

    Perhaps Farr, like most, arrived without a rifle as brand new service rifles were being provided? Rifles which were intentionally made for the matches and received considerable attention to accuracy?





    New rifles. Made from the $100,000 appropriated for the matches that year.
    Farr used a rifle that had been repaired. Again, he picked a rifle from a rack. If life was fair everyone would have been been required to pick a rifle from a rack. If all rifles were equal it would not have been necessary for him to road test his first pick. And then there was that part that should have embarrassed the organizers. He should have been given the rifle he shot; he should have been able to leave with the rifle, instead a collection was taken to purchase the rifle and then it was shipped to him. I thought that was a disgrace, that was no way to treat an old shooter from Washington.

    F. Guffey
    Last edited by fguffey; 09-14-2016 at 09:38.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •