Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 35
  1. #21

    Default

    As test beds for electronic equipment. They took one A3 and transplanted a complete F15 nose on it to test the fire controll system!!!! Raytheon loves them!!!!!!

    Here is a photo of the remaining A3s at Van Nuys mixed in with other A/C..

    "Give Me A Fast Ship And I Will Sail In Harms Way" John Paul Jones, U.S. NAVY

  2. #22

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John HOLBROOK View Post
    Not only was the connector different, the impedence of the earphones was different.

    GO FIGURE!!!!

    We in the Navy used an ARC 28 for UHF communications....
    Arc 28? ANTIQUE! We used ARC 34's in the 100's then moved to Arc 51's in the SLUF's and finally to ARC164's. The FM was 622's until replaced by ARC 186's. Funny story about that On the FM, we heard someone break into a pilots conversation telling him to get off the freq, as it was restricted. Found out he was an army type in Missouri. Pilot replied "this is an A7 over Tucson! Heard no more from the army. Skip can be odd, we once picked up a fire engine in NEW YORK!

    However When I was in Panama just before taking out pineapple face, they STILL had some ARC 5's for ground comm.

  3. #23

    Default

    Hey John, the ARC 28 used vacuum tubes!!!!!!! As did the AN-ASB 1 radar bombing system, also the optical bombing system we used was taken from the Norden Bomb Sight!!!!!!!!!!

    Remember, I am from the Stone Age of Naval Aviation!!!!
    Last edited by John HOLBROOK; 06-22-2010 at 01:52.
    "Give Me A Fast Ship And I Will Sail In Harms Way" John Paul Jones, U.S. NAVY

  4. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elkins WV
    Posts
    3,696

    Default

    We don't have real Navy now days. What was once the US Navy is now "Carnival Cruse Lines".

  5. #25
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    P'cola,FL but headed back to (gasp) IL
    Posts
    226

    Default

    Bring on the EMP!! We'll who still has comms!!
    "Paddle faster - I hear banjo music!"

  6. #26
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elkins WV
    Posts
    3,696

    Default

    Some of the old times might find this amusing. Myself I find it disgusting that the military has gotten in this shape for no good reason other than lack of discipline and pride.
    http://www.strategypage.com/htmw/htm.../20100622.aspx

  7. #27
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Poplar Bluff, MO
    Posts
    503

    Default

    Great pictures. Isn't that pretty much the same plane the AF called an RB-66?

  8. #28

    Default

    There was only about 3% interchangability between the RB-66 and the A3D.....
    "Give Me A Fast Ship And I Will Sail In Harms Way" John Paul Jones, U.S. NAVY

  9. #29
    Viking68 Guest

    Default

    I just found this forum by accident. I am an ex AQ in the original Heavy Ten at Whiidby. I need to make a couple of corrections. I was an Avionics shift supervisor and Avionics QA. The UHF radio was the ARC 27 vice 28. The VHF radio was the ARC - 38. Both types were tube types. The A-3 carried two ARC- 27's back in the hell hole under the tail. The ARC -38 was mounted right below the 27's.
    The bombing system was the ASB-1/1A or ASB-7. The gear in the -1 was all vacuum tube and the 7 was mostly transisters.

  10. Default

    Weasel LOL. I have been in the F-18 community since 85. I'm out of the Navy now but still involved with the F-18's. That F-18 tanker joke is always passed around by people that work on different platforms. Never has been considered.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 12-07-2013, 09:51

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •