"The experts had replaced parts of the gun that were broken during FBI analysis and said that the gun fired as designed."
I see the defense using the above statement as a change in the physical assembly is changing the outcome of the test. The broken parts caused by the FBI is grounds for not having a reasonable or probability of being guilty. Since this last testing was not "done with the same gun."
I am only looking at the statement and how it can be turned around by the defense. What do you guys think?
Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.
Author unkown.