Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Bay area, Calif
    Posts
    14,985

    Default So, it took over a year to figure out how a revolver works ? ...

    So much for experts.
    Baldwin is a baldfaced liar saying he didn't pull the trigger.
    It has to be pulled once the gun is cocked in order for
    it to go bang.
    I recall earlier how Vern said you can "Fan" - but in order to do
    that you first have to pull trigger and either tie or hold it back.
    The Experts said early on that the trigger had to have been pulled,
    so why did they scrap that and now bring it back again ?
    I suspected from the outset that Baldwin knew what he has doing. Still do.

    Dly Mail article about possible recharging of Baldwin.
    Won't copy

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Alabama, Gulf Coast Region
    Posts
    9,489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dogtag View Post
    So much for experts.
    Baldwin is a baldfaced liar saying he didn't pull the trigger.
    It has to be pulled once the gun is cocked in order for
    it to go bang.
    I recall earlier how Vern said you can "Fan" - but in order to do
    that you first have to pull trigger and either tie or hold it back.
    The Experts said early on that the trigger had to have been pulled,
    so why did they scrap that and now bring it back again ?
    I suspected from the outset that Baldwin knew what he has doing. Still do.

    Dly Mail article about possible recharging of Baldwin.
    Won't copy
    Article posted OK on my thread "Such Geniuses".

    Must be additional money to be made here. Baldwin was already set free as we all knew he would be. Even if he had shot her between the eyes on purpose he would be free or do very little time in a celebrity prison.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Cleveland Ohio
    Posts
    1,416

    Default

    "The experts had replaced parts of the gun that were broken during FBI analysis and said that the gun fired as designed."
    I see the defense using the above statement as a change in the physical assembly is changing the outcome of the test. The broken parts caused by the FBI is grounds for not having a reasonable or probability of being guilty. Since this last testing was not "done with the same gun."

    I am only looking at the statement and how it can be turned around by the defense. What do you guys think?
    Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.
    Author unkown.

  4. #4

    Default

    Baldwin is and always was a lying POS. Him and his kind will face the ultimate Judgement one day.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Bay area, Calif
    Posts
    14,985

    Default

    Yeah, the Creep will slither out of it somehow.

  6. Default

    As soon as the Feds damaged the gun he walks.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Dallas, TX metro.. formerly Phoenix metro, AZ
    Posts
    2,166

    Default

    they "changed parts" ??
    well, that will get him off the hook.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Alabama, Gulf Coast Region
    Posts
    9,489

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Former Cav View Post
    they "changed parts" ??
    well, that will get him off the hook.
    By rights the feds should be charged with tampering with the evidence but here again: "no one is above the law and they claim to be the law".

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    West of Fresno, CA
    Posts
    765

    Default

    FBI, ya gotta be joking!

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Bay area, Calif
    Posts
    14,985

    Default

    A revolver's workings are complicated. Truth is, they're probably
    still trying to figure out how to put it back together.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •