Originally Posted by
Dan Shapiro
Personally I think there was some sadistic SOB at Springfield, and after work one day stopped off at the local bar with some of his fellow workers. After several drinks he said "Hey! I know how we can screw with weapons collectors in the future. Let's start stamping all the parts with numbers! And every so often, we'll change the number on the part and leave no paperwork explaining why. That'll drive 'em nuts!"
Then another guy chimed in with "Yeah, we'll call the changes "revisions" and add a sequential number to the part. And sometimes we'll put a dash between the part number and the revision number, and sometimes we won't."
Then a third guy (a real wise guy) said "Hey! And then we'll stop marking certain parts and put no number at all!"
They all went home laughing their a$$es off!
Actually either Major Culver or Gus Fisher related an armorer in the 70's was going to add some markings hidden under the stock just to tick off collectors on some sniper rifles.
Phillip McGregor (OFC)
"I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur