Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 12
  1. #1

    Default Springfield Model 1922MII

    Springfield Model 1922MII s/n 5396 barrel date 10/31
    Bolt is marked 'NS' and 'M2',
    Grasping groove stock.
    Any information would help me with this M1922
    Thanks


    B3A3E4CE-7C5C-424D-AF7C-8F920F31EFE7.jpg
    D4BBF91B-D994-4D6F-A813-0EA05C8552C9.jpg
    8F3DD154-6251-457D-8D38-A245EF420419.jpg
    D7BFE967-C235-4A3A-A529-F4E16AD4F1A2.jpg
    8DEB8432-6259-401A-BA00-E6BB2DC8E2F2.jpg
    U.S. Army Vietnam Vet '68-69'

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1,899

    Default

    Very nice. Love those Lyman #48 sights. I shoot a 1903 in 30-06 of the same vintage.

  3. #3

    Default

    Are the M1922 training rifles listed in the SRS records?
    U.S. Army Vietnam Vet '68-69'

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    9,256

    Default

    Beautiful rifle. Can't help with more than that but you have a gem.
    Last edited by Art; 08-06-2022 at 08:17.

  5. #5

    Default

    An early rifle that was converted to the M2 style bolt. The original bolt throw was like the 1903 Springfield, but the M2 (MII as on your rifle) was a short throw.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    7,837
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Duster42 View Post
    Are the M1922 training rifles listed in the SRS records?
    Several are. I currently own one that belonged to a US Marine and former Dewar Trophy winner.
    "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    974
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Duster 42, Your rifle, #5396, is not listed in SRS records. The stock is correct for a 1922M1 issue rifle. It would have been made in the late 1920's so the barrel is a replacement. The second I after the model # would have been applied when the rifle was upgraded to 1922MII sometime after 1935. The buttplate is for a 1903. The bolt well, round channel the bolt moves in, was in the white when the rifle was built. If that area is parkerized or blued, that rifle has been refinished. The serial number would have been etched on the bottom of the bolt when the M2 bolt was installed by Springfield Armory or by one of the arsenals.
    Cartouches on the left side of the stock would indicate which arsenal replaced the bolt. The finish on the receiver looks to be original. If so it is a very uncommon rifle. Nearly all the 1922 series were parkerized when they went through rebuild.

    It is uncommonly clean rifle.

    Herschel

  8. Default

    Interesting that both barrel and receiver look to have original blue finish. SRS has records suggesting early 1922M1 issue rifles were parkerized in a darker color than later rebuilds. However, I have and have seen early rifles that appear to have original blue. The barrel appears to be a later replacement, but still in the 1922M1 time frame. Likely scenario is the barrel was replaced first, the bolt change happened a few years later. IF this was all done in the service you can date the bolt conversion based on the headspace features on the bolt.
    Great rifles!

  9. Default

    HS had about a half dozen 1922s, don't know the vintage. Hate to think what happened to them.
    You have a real prize, congratulations.

  10. #10

    Default

    Thanks to all for the excellent information.
    U.S. Army Vietnam Vet '68-69'

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •