Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,371

    Default Neat photo I have never seen.

    Two U.S. foot soldiers serving as guards at a Gettysburg Reunion that brought together 50,000 American Civil War Veterans, Pennsylvania, 1913.
    2.jpg
    "Wars are, of course, as a rule to be avoided; but they are far better than certain kinds of peace." - T.R.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    colorized photo?


    wondering if the rifles were really that worn, finish wise,

  3. #3

    Default

    no handguard clips in the left rifle

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,699

    Default

    Cool picture. Thanks for posting it. Sincerely. bruce.
    " Unlike most conservatives, libs have no problem exploiting dead children and dancing on their graves."

  5. #5

    Default

    The hand guard clips weren't added until some time in 1910, and the rifles probably hadn't been back for maintenance.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Interesting photo. Original b/w would be valuable. (All items related to Gettysburg are valuable.). The soldiers appear to be fully armed and are ready for anything. Probably a company that was assigned guard duty to protect and assist the veterans. You have to wonder if they appreciated the significance of the event?

    Some observations:

    The tent behind them appears to have a veteran seated in a folding chair.

    The butt plate, bolt and barrel bands do not appear to be blued. Notice the foresight hood.

    Blue hat cords signifying enlisted men? (Gold = officers?) Both have hat pins, possibly regimental insignias. (Add - The soldier on the left has a regimental insignia pinned to his shirt pocket flap.).

    Standard issue ammo belt with suspenders, watch fob and a clean unworn (recently issued?) bayonet.
    Last edited by Merc; 04-06-2021 at 06:08.

  7. Default

    Thanks for sharing!!

  8. #8

    Default

    Have rifle #406328, bbl. date 2-10. The handguard is a shortened 1905 type with sight line cut modification and no clips. No other 1910 mods are present.
    J.J.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Both soldiers are lightweights. I’ll bet the soldier on the right doesn’t weigh more than 120 pounds.

  10. #10

    Default S stamp on shortened handguard without clips

    Here is a photo of the s stamp on a shortened handguard without clips but groovedP1010023_0017_017.jpg

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •