the war was fought over taxes and tariffs and to keep the south from selling their goods to England.
You are totally wrong. If there had never been a single slave in North America the Civil War would have still happened. You are brain washed...
Lee, like the majority of the South, believed the State was more important than the Union. It was called States Rights and that had a meaning back then. According to the Constitution as adopted, the States had more rights than the Federal Government. Read the Constitution it, and the Bill of Rights, is a restriction on the Federal Government and not the States. Had there been no Civil War, slavery would have still been abolished... albeit one State at a time.
Today traitors abound that want a totalitarian dictatorship and a utopian world where everything is perfect, everybody are exactly the same, same ambition, the same thoughts, the same level of education (no doctors, no lawyers, no indian chiefs) samey, samey, around the globe.
When you say "Quite a few historians agree... " What does that mean? I am a historian, I have college degrees in History, Political Science, and a minor in Economics. Today nobody is really studying history any more. What they are studying is the opinions, and the "take" that other people have instead of reading and studying the original documents and archives.
Oh yeah, what is reprehensible today was social norms 160 years ago. Spanking children was common when I was a child, today it is reprehensible. So that makes my parents "reprehensible???"
As Derry Brownfield used to say you are "ignorance gone to seed."
Last edited by RED; 06-12-2020 at 03:12. Reason: Sp.
"States Rights" to what Red?
The statues were controversial when erected. Some things dont change, and that's unfortunate.
"The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman
the first 13th amendment https://www.gilderlehrman.org/histor...20the%20nation.
The States Rights to govern themselves. Help me out here, tell me the controversial objections to the Columbus, Lincoln, Washington, Jefferson, Iwo Jima, Monuments.
Tell me why the monument honoring the Massachusetts 54th Infantry was controversial and needed to be destroyed. Come on genius, documentation please.
Tell me how this erasing history movement is different than the Muslims destroying ancient Buddhas statues. or destroying the Pyramids in Egypt... Stupid is...
Last edited by RED; 06-12-2020 at 03:39.
What specifically did the Southern states want to govern themselves? It's not THAT hard to find an answer.
All the other questions you have, you would be better to ask the people doing the damage. I dont support it.
- - - Updated - - -
Articles of secession, the historical facts, completely disagree with your opinion.
"The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman
People say these generals were traitors to their country. No, these generals fought for their country. The CSA.
If the war was fought over slavery, why did the Federal government , by the act of the president wait till 9-22-1862 to create Emancipation Proclamation and wait till 1-1-1863 to make it effective, and why did it only relate to the slaves in the 10 states in rebellion and not the slaves in the north?