Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 13
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Port Clinton, Ohio
    Posts
    116

    Default Looking For Stock Cartouches Information

    I don't know much about 1903 rifles, but I do know more about 1903-A3s. I recently purchased a very nice looking Springfield 1903. I think it is mostly original. The serial number is 1218xxx (1921 manufactured) and the barrel appears to be original (dated 2 - 21). The rifle is in beautiful shape with what appears to be original parkerization. I am trying to find out what the original stock cartouches should be. I get confused in reading through the internet information. Some articles claim that it should be a blocked SA FAL. Some claim that all rebuilt rifles have a circled P proof mark. Some say that original 1903s do not have a proofed P. Some talk about an eagle head cartouche.

    Can you guys help me out with my request for info. Thanks, Lee

  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leecork View Post
    [B][B] I get confused in reading through the internet information.
    You think???

    If it's even a half-way nice '03, you paid enough for it to easily afford Campbell's (my choice) or Brophy's books. Yet you seek "free" on the web? That's cheapskate thinking. Mr. Beard may help you out, but I'm not sure you deserve it.

  3. Default

    Joe Spangler has a good website for sales and information. There is a new book out on US inspectors that is excellent. Brophy’s book is probably the better of the two mentioned, but the more books the better.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    besides searching here and gunboards,

    Vishootershttp://www.vishooter.net/m1903.html
    1903 https://m1903.com/


    post pics and ask questions,

    pictures help, gives a better reference to look over

  5. #5

    Default

    Excuse the man for asking a question! Dang.

  6. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kragrifle View Post
    Brophy’s book is probably the better of the two mentioned, but the more books the better.
    In some ways, such as photos of accessories, it certainly is, but if you read my thread on the Lyman 48C sights, you'll see that his error caused me to fly off on quite an unnecessary wild goose chase.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Ventura, CA.
    Posts
    178

    Default

    Wouldn't a 1921 dated 03 have been blued not parkerized ?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Port Clinton, Ohio
    Posts
    116

    Default

    That's nice. As clintonhater says, I am a cheapskate. I would rather target my monies towards acquiring really nice guns and shooting them. My guns are beautiful. Too bad that clintonhater owns just ugly guns.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by leecork View Post
    That's nice. As clintonhater says, I am a cheapskate. I would rather target my monies towards acquiring really nice guns and shooting them. My guns are beautiful. Too bad that clintonhater owns just ugly guns.
    a wise collector buys a book or 2 for each avenue of collecting,


    as well as bookmarks stuff on the net,


    yes, most if not all will have some errors, but over time they get pointed out and folks learn more from them,

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jmm03 View Post
    Wouldn't a 1921 dated 03 have been blued not parkerized ?
    No.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by leecork View Post
    Too bad that clintonhater owns just ugly guns.
    Yes, that's very sad, but there are compensations: he's not an ignoramus.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •