Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14

Thread: WTB Lyman 48-C

  1. Default WTB Lyman 48-C

    Will pay $200 for a nice one with early-style adjustment knobs, & notch in base for stripper-clip guide; not the variant, in other words, made for the M1922.
    Last edited by clintonhater; 04-20-2020 at 08:30.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    I would say call Garry Fellers but I hear he is either retired completely, or passed, not sure which

    you could also try Ken Bean, also known as The Sight Man,
    he may have one,

    google will get you his number

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lyman View Post
    I would say call Garry Fellers but I hear he is either retired completely, or passed, not sure which

    you could also try Ken Bean, also known as The Sight Man,
    I knew them both--Gary (if anybody was "The Sight Man," it was him, not latecomer Bean), but he croaked long ago. Today, neither one of them can compete with ebay. There are two 48 Cs on ebay right now, but neither are "right" for my particular application. Eventually, one will show up on ebay, but I'm tired of waiting.

  4. #4

    Default

    Hello
    PM sent
    Bob

  5. Default

    Hi, I have one let me find it and I will get back to you, regards, Mike

  6. Default

    Hi, I have the 48 S. So I can't help you I think the 48 S is for the 1922 and the 48 C is for the 1903. Your reference to the 1922 confused me, my standard state of affairs. Good Luck in your search ,regards, Mike

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    N.E. New Jersey, west of the 'gorllia' building.
    Posts
    307

    Default

    The 48S has a short base and the stock need not be cut to mount the base. The 48C requires a notched stock, and comes with or without the clip guide notch (for '03), also used on the M1922 series rifles without the notch.
    Last edited by Tom in N.J.; 05-15-2020 at 04:56.

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    Hi, I have the 48 S. So I can't help you I think the 48 S is for the 1922 and the 48 C is for the 1903.
    No, the 48S was Lyman's "standard" 48 for Spfd. receivers, inc. the 1922, but the "C" variant differed in including an aperture disk, which the "S" did not have as standard eqpt., even though the aperture hood was threaded for one. The disk, if installed, made reading the windage scale difficult, so on the "C" variants, the scale was installed in front of, rather than behind, the aperture. A trivial difference, it seems, but if a disk is installed, you have to remove it before adjusting windage on the "S," which is a nuisance I know all too well! The "S" included Lyman's famous "turn-down" peep (his first patent), which the "C" lacked, presumably because the disk served the same purpose.

    Springfield's "issue" 48 for both 1922s & special '03s was the "C" variant, so trivial as the difference between the two sights is, it's immediately obvious if the sight isn't "right," as was the case with my NRA Sporter; when I bought it 40+ yrs ago, I had no idea the "S" sight on it was a replacement, though why someone did this remains a mystery.

    If all this isn't complicated enough, Lyman made TWO variants of the 48C!!! One with & one without the grooves in the base to match the '03 clip guides. The ones "without" were intended for the 1922, the ones "with" for '03s, such as NMs & NRA Sporters; far as I know, these two different "Cs" weren't marked differently, but the visual difference is obvious. 48Cs without the clip guides milled in the base, intended for 1922s, are more common than the ones with these grooves.

    I found one 48C with clip guides, but also need a "plain" 48C without the guides to install on a 1922, if anyone has one surplus to their needs.
    Last edited by clintonhater; 05-16-2020 at 03:51.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Arkansas
    Posts
    974
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    clintonhater,
    If your Springfield .22 is a Model of 1922, the correct Lyman sight for it is the Lyman 48B. According to an old Lyman catalog, the 48C was
    designed for the 1922M1. The difference in the two was that the 48B had one minute clicks on the windage and elevation and the 48C had half minute
    clicks. The 48B will have 5 index marks per revolution on the elevation knob and the 48C has 10 ondex marks per revolution.
    Good luck if you are in need of the 48B as they are scarcer than the 48C.

    This might be considered trivia to some but significant to some of us who want our rifle parts correct. I checked on two Models of 1922 that I have
    in my collection and both had the 48B sight. I collect the 1903 NRA Sporters and they came with the Lyman 48 with the turn down peep. I believe they
    were called the 48S back in the 1920's and 1930's. The shallow based 48S that does not require inletting the stock came into production
    in 1947. I will look through my spare sights to see if I have a 48C but believe all my spares have the turn down peep.
    Some of 1922M1 rifles have 48C with the clip slot in the base and some do not. I think both are correct. If you a stickler for detail
    I will see which serial numbers of the 1922M1 has clip slotted base and which do not.
    Last edited by Herschel; 05-16-2020 at 12:20.

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Herschel View Post
    clintonhater,
    I collect the 1903 NRA Sporters and they came with the Lyman 48 with the turn down peep. I believe they
    were called the 48S back in the 1920's and 1930's. The shallow based 48S that does not require inletting the stock came into production
    in 1947.
    Herschel, I know you're better informed about both Sporters & 1922s than myself, but check out what Brophy says about the 48S on P. 479, 5th para., which was what I was going by; he specifically says the S was not issue, but Lyman's commercial model for sporterized '03s. I'd like to believe the S on my Sporter could be original, because it's like new, whereas the C I just bought as a replacement is a good deal less nice.

    I only WISH I had a 1922, & I'd take it with any sight! What I really meant was 1922M1.
    Last edited by clintonhater; 05-16-2020 at 04:39.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •