Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 17 of 17
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sunray View Post
    The No. 4 Rifle was a simpler design over the No. 1.
    You’re correct. The British obviously took great pride in their engineering skills. They lead the world into the Industrial Age.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lyman View Post
    checked my Savage last night,

    no marks at all in that area
    I’ll have to start paying more attention to the Savage No. 4s at gun shows to see if they’ve been punched. It will remain an open question however, it wouldn’t surprise me if the British required a hardness test on every 10th receiver produced.

    I find it strange that the serial number is stamped on the metal wrist band instead of the receiver.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Merc View Post
    I’ll have to start paying more attention to the Savage No. 4s at gun shows to see if they’ve been punched. It will remain an open question however, it wouldn’t surprise me if the British required a hardness test on every 10th receiver produced.

    I find it strange that the serial number is stamped on the metal wrist band instead of the receiver.
    the wrist is part of the receiver, and where most #4's and #5's were stamped until sometime after WW2,

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by lyman View Post
    the wrist is part of the receiver, and where most #4's and #5's were stamped until sometime after WW2,
    Oops. You’re correct.

  5. #15

    Default

    Why does everyone assume the marks are British? No4 rifles served in countries around the globe. They spent time outside the service of Britain and her commonwealths. They have been out in the secondary and civilian markets for decades.

    It's fun to imagine that all our rifles were carried by Tommy Adkins until released from service. For all we know Billy Bob could have thrown a fork at Bubba Joe during a July 4th BBQ and hit the rifle squarely dead center. That in itself is worth another beer.
    2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


    **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JB White View Post
    Why does everyone assume the marks are British? No4 rifles served in countries around the globe. They spent time outside the service of Britain and her commonwealths. They have been out in the secondary and civilian markets for decades.

    It's fun to imagine that all our rifles were carried by Tommy Adkins until released from service. For all we know Billy Bob could have thrown a fork at Bubba Joe during a July 4th BBQ and hit the rifle squarely dead center. That in itself is worth another beer.
    Nice to see you here again, JB. There’s no doubt that many No. 4s passed through many hands over the years. I bought my lend-lease rifle several years ago from the estate of a past VFW Post commander who was a WW2 vet. He had quite a collection of firearms, as I recall. His No. 4 was the only military rifle that was for sale. I suspect it was still in service somewhere up through the 1950s. There’s a K and 51 stamped on the wrist band that could be a rebuild date and inspector’s initial. The punch marks will remain a challenge for now.

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    452

    Default

    That's funny JB White Kinda looks like fork marks to me also.
    No punch marks on my 1942 No4 Mk1 star either.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •