Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 48

Thread: How good is the condition of the U.S. military after 3 years of Trump?

  1. #31

    Default

    Actually, what I describe is exactly the policy coming out of the oval office, and it's gaslighting to suggest otherwise.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Houston Metro
    Posts
    3,220

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by togor View Post
    A question is do we really need a $700B/year military? Well what's the mission? How has the mission changed under Trump?
    You have asked the $700B dollar question! I don't believe we need a defense department as big as it is. Who are the threats we need to defend against? We aren't going to invade China or Russia and I doubt they are going to invade us. Besides the force structure isn't big enough to do it. The days of large forces going conventionally head to head are over. We are being invaded over our southern border and we have a failed nation state on that border. That's where our defense focus should be.
    To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m1ashooter View Post
    . We are being invaded over our southern border and we have a failed nation state on that border. That's where our defense focus should be.
    yes indeed.

  4. Default

    A lot of that $700B a year Defense budget goes to bases and their civilian employees, contractors and their employees. I recall some years ago a Democrat California congressman who was a big advocate for cutting the defense budget and spending that money on social programs had his district redrawn to include a large military base. He changed his tune PDQ. I recall a political cartoon from the early 1960s, showed a somewhat angry Congressman wearing a sandwich board which on the front said "Keep cutting defense spending ! " and on the back "But not in MY district!"

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    AR
    Posts
    11,616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by m1ashooter View Post
    You have asked the $700B dollar question! I don't believe we need a defense department as big as it is. Who are the threats we need to defend against? We aren't going to invade China or Russia and I doubt they are going to invade us. Besides the force structure isn't big enough to do it. The days of large forces going conventionally head to head are over. We are being invaded over our southern border and we have a failed nation state on that border. That's where our defense focus should be.
    No but China can take over Taiwan, the Philippines and all of indonesia. Russia can annex the Ukraine. Iran can attack and overcome all of the mideast... including Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

    No, we are not being invaded from the south...it is not an invasion when the Democrats encourage and help illegal criminals come to the USA to help them overthrow our government.

  6. #36

    Default

    Overthrow the government how? Is overthrow the correct word? It has a specific meaning.

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,852
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RED View Post
    No but China can take over Taiwan, the Philippines and all of indonesia. Russia can annex the Ukraine. Iran can attack and overcome all of the mideast... including Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

    No, we are not being invaded from the south...it is not an invasion when the Democrats encourage and help illegal criminals come to the USA to help them overthrow our government.
    curious,

    did the R's or D's put the Shah in power?


    we (both R and D) have a bad habit of messing with other countries politics,, with poor results, esp in the post WW2 years,

    which seems to be OK,, until another country messes with or attempts to mess with ours,,

  8. #38
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Houston Metro
    Posts
    3,220

    Default

    Red

    I respect your opinion, but Russia could have annexed the Ukraine and they didn't. Iran doesn't have the logistical tail to over run the Middle East nor does China yet. We also don't have the logistical tail. As you are aware you have to move people and parts and we don't have the shipping any longer to do so.
    To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy

  9. #39

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by togor View Post
    He called me a Communist, which I don't like, but since we lower the bar for Red so he can stay clear of the time-out chair, sure okay why not. Ironic though that he calls me a Communist when he is the one supporting a foreign policy goal of changing the outcome of the Cold War such that Moscow wins and collective security under US leadership retreats globally.
    Easy there! I get called that sometime too, I just laugh 'cause I'm way worse than that. I'm an Anarchist!

    jn

    - - - Updated - - -

    Quote Originally Posted by m1ashooter View Post
    Red

    I respect your opinion, but Russia could have annexed the Ukraine and they didn't. Iran doesn't have the logistical tail to over run the Middle East nor does China yet. We also don't have the logistical tail. As you are aware you have to move people and parts and we don't have the shipping any longer to do so.
    For that you can thank Dick Nixon, who dismantled the Merchant Marine just when I got out of the USCG and was planning on spending my life at sea.

    jn

  10. #40

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jon_norstog View Post
    Easy there! I get called that sometime too, I just laugh 'cause I'm way worse than that. I'm an Anarchist!

    jn
    Anarchists at least have a plan!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •