Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 16
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default 1866 2 band rifles

    how uncommon or rare are these?

    I picked up a collection last week and got 2 1866's,
    one a standard 3 band, that had been nickeled, or chromed, not sure which, but it otherwise a nice rifle, despite the nickel

    and a 2 band,

    looking at Mr. Hosmer's book, it seems to be correct, (stock thin at wrist, likely from sanding, but nothing added as mentioned )
    I'll try to get some pics up by this weekend,

    it is worn, but not horribly so, and missing the cleaning rod,

    wondering if this is something I should set in the corner and keep for a bit,


    (Full disclosure, I am an FFL\SOT that likes old stuff)

  2. #2

    Default

    You do not want a thinned wrist - that is not SA work. Is the middle band in its' original location, or has its' spring slot been filled and a proper upper band fitted?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    thanks,

    I did not notice any woodwork around the spring slot,

    I'll try to get some pics up by this weekend, if I have time

  4. #4

    Default

    Two-band 66's seem to come three basic ways:

    (1) The properly-done (around 1100 in 1871) versions made by SA, referred to as the "Model 1866 rifle, Short". These were repaired 3-banders which had suffered muzzle damage. They will have set-back cleaning rods like the parent arm. They should not have a band-spring patch, and will have a properly located upper band.

    (2) The ones that "look good" but are not. They will have the middle band removed (with a often near-invisible spring patch) and an upper band fitted, but not always exactly in the proper spot, resulting in some odd front end geometry. Cleaning rods can vary.

    (3) The ugly ones with severely thinned wrists and the middle band left untouched, leaving a very long amount of wood out to the tip, and no "upper band" per se. Again the cleaning rod, if fitted, can be whatever.

    The Model 1866 (aka 1867) Cadet is a totally different gun, miniaturized in all respects, shorter stock thinner all over, 1867-dated lock, etc.
    Last edited by Dick Hosmer; 02-05-2019 at 10:13.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    here we go, switched to point and shoot and downloaded

    1866 001.jpg.


    note, the band was installed by the previous owner upside down
    fixed it after pics were taken


    1866 002.jpg

    1866 003.jpg

    1866 004.jpg
    Last edited by lyman; 02-07-2019 at 07:28.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

    Default

    Last edited by lyman; 02-07-2019 at 07:33.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Beach Va, not Va Beach
    Posts
    10,848
    Blog Entries
    5

  10. #10

    Default

    Thanks for posting the pictures. You have presented an example of my number (3). The work was not done at SA. If you are looking for an authentic SA 2-band '66, that one doesn't fill the bill, unfortunately.

    While they certainly do not grow on every tree, no one would consider them rare. That one, however, does look honestly old, ands could be displayed as an example of a Bannerman conversion.
    Last edited by Dick Hosmer; 02-07-2019 at 08:56.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •