Strangely quiet

[Merc]

OK guys, here it is. Do you support the President’s bump stock ban?

[S.A. Boggs]

Mixed feelings at this time.
Sam

[k arga]

I'm with Sam just don't know what to think , but sometimes we may have to bend a little.

kurt

[Vern Humphrey]

I'm with Sam just don't know what to think , but sometimes we may have to bend a little.

kurt

Bend a little in the shower and see what happens.

This is a horrible precedent -- taking private property without due process of law.

And WHY? What will this accomplish? Nothing!

[7.62match]

NO.

[jon_norstog]

[QUOTE=Vern Humphrey;546783...

This is a horrible precedent -- taking private property without due process of law.

...[/QUOTE]


If there is no due process the Court will have its say. The Supremes are pretty strong on property rights and the fifth amendment provisions regarding them.

jn

[lyman]

no

[JB White]

Here we go again. I've already made my position known on previous bump stock threads.

I can see this topic going the way of those now nauseating threads on the SMLE forums in regard to head spacing. Page after page, three times a year, for 25 years. People repeating everything which has been said repeatedly on all the previous threads with no definitive answer in the end.

[Allen]

NO. Not the way it is being done. The BATF deemed these things legal from day one. They were legal when everyone bought one. Now the Trump administration has banned them and demanding destruction or turn in within 90 days. I assume fines and or jail time will take affect after that. No compensation at all at time of writing. This is over-reach and could apply to anything if passed as is.

[m1ashooter]

No I don't.