Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 28
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    147

    Default Photos of 1892 Rifle

    This is the start of the photos for the 1892 rifle made in 1894. Starting with the left side.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Here is the right side.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    147

    Default

    One more from the right and one from the top since I'm limited to posting 5 at a time
    Attached Images Attached Images

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    147

    Default

    5 more from the top
    Attached Images Attached Images

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    147

    Default

    5 from the bottom
    Attached Images Attached Images

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Misc detail photos, first of two groups
    Attached Images Attached Images

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Second group of misc detail photos. This is the last of the photos of the 1892 rifle and 1894 bayonet.

    Hope you enjoy them.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  8. #18

    Default

    Does the scabbard have the trapezoidal mouthpiece?

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Oct 2016
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    147

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dick Hosmer View Post
    Does the scabbard have the trapezoidal mouthpiece?
    No Sir, unfortunately it does not. i acquired the scabbard separately from the 1894 bayonet. It would be great if I had one of the early ones with the trapezoidal mouthpiece.

  10. #20

    Default

    I believe the cleaning rod is incorrect as well, but you are in good company - VERY few of the surviving '92s in collections have their original rod. Not saying they are ALL bad, but (according to the late and greatly missed Bill Mook) proper rods are few and far between.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •