Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. Default CMP '03 Springfield

    I recently purchased an '03 Springfield from a dealer that is supposedly an early CMP purchase that the buyer lost paperwork for. I will contact the CMP and see if it actually was sold by them. It is a very nice example and I'm pleased with it. I already had an '03 that I purchased from the CMP in 2002. The recent one is in much nicer condition (pics later), so I am considering selling the CMP rifle. I would like input from those more knowledgeable than I about the rifle. I have done nothing with the CMP rifle other than cleaning the bore, degreasing the metal some and lubricating it. I have fired the CMP rifle but didn't take notes. I remember it functioned fine and I had no problems with it. Please click on the link, check out the pictures and tell me what you think. If there are pics of certain components you don't see, possibly I could supply those as well. BTW, the pictures include all the markings I can see on the rifle. Any thoughts on value of the rifle would be appreciated.

    http://www.fototime.com/inv/7BDB1089FACECF4

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,701

    Default

    Fine looking shooter 03! Happily it makes the HN serial range! Looks like a Sedley barrel. I have a ca. 1918 SA 1903, ser. no. 810,xxx that also has a Sedley barrel. It is a very very fine shooting rifle. You will enjoy using that rifle with the C stock. It is a real improvement over the S stock. IIRC, the M-1 stock was patterned after the C stock. What's the bore on your rifle look like? The bolt on mine is a WWII era replacement. What is yours? Sincerely. bruce.
    " Unlike most conservatives, libs have no problem exploiting dead children and dancing on their graves."

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,274

    Default

    Your rifle appears to be a CMP Greek rifle. I don't know what they're selling for now, but they were around $500-$600 with a Type C stock back around 2003 when the CMP was selling the rifles. With very few exceptions, the CMP Greek rifles had good bores.

    The CMP charges a fee for researching a rifle. Good Luck!

    J.B.

  4. Default Some clarification...

    I may have confused things by mentioning two different rifles. The one in the pictures is the one I bought from the CMP in May of 2002. I have the CMP invoice and certificate of authenticity for it.

    The one I got from the dealer this month is the one that was advertised as sold by CMP but with no paperwork. I will post pictures of it soon. I have already contacted the CMP and I will probably pay their $25 fee to check their records to see if it was sold by them in the past.
    Last edited by Brad in Idaho; 09-18-2018 at 06:50.

  5. Default Pics of the '03 Springfield Mark I

    Here is a link to pics of the 1903 Springfield Mark I that I purchased from a dealer this month. Haven't had it to the range yet but everything seems to function properly. Comments welcome on this one too. Thx, Brad

    http://www.fototime.com/inv/1CD49D05D202D4E

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    London, Ontario
    Posts
    3,251

    Default

    Suspect the biggest and only downside to that rifle is the refinishing job on the stock. Too shiney.
    Dunno if a Mk I would be considered to be a shooter vs a regular 1918 '03 given it was modified for the Pedersen Device. That alone might increase its collector value except for the 1939 rebarreling.
    There any knowledge of Mk I's being Greek rifles?
    Spelling and grammar count!

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Colo. Spgs., Colorado
    Posts
    2,568

    Default

    I would suggest that the biggest downside to this rifle is that the stock is not a Mark I. There is no clearance cut at the ejection port that I can see.
    "A generation which ignores history has no past and no future." - Jean Boden

    "In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: It goes on."
    -- Robert Frost

  8. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill D View Post
    I would suggest that the biggest downside to this rifle is that the stock is not a Mark I. There is no clearance cut at the ejection port that I can see.
    I am not well versed on '03's. I did a search and found pics of what it is you are referring to. How does the incorrect stock affect value? Thanks for the info. Other than issues with the stock I think it's a good example of this model. What do you think?
    Last edited by Brad in Idaho; 09-19-2018 at 09:08.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    My wife's house in Nebraska
    Posts
    4,976

    Default

    I wouldn’t call it a Mark I because aside from the receiver stating so, all of the original Mark I parts of the rifle have been replaced. Everything.
    Last edited by Fred; 09-21-2018 at 05:54.

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fred View Post
    I wouldn’t call it a Mark I because aside from the receiver stating so, all of the original Mark I parts of the rifle have been replaced. Everything.
    Everything but the receiver, which does have the Mark I ejection port modification. I didn't know anything about the Mark I when I bought it, I was just looking for a representative example of an '03 Springfield. It was not advertised as being anything special. I could tell the rifle had been refinished but not by who. It is supposedly a rifle from the CMP about 15 years ago with lost paperwork. I will pay their fee to find out.

    I did find a faint A A H I on the stock just above the trigger, there are some other letters above that I can't make out. AAHI was a marking from Augusta Arsenal (rebuild) from what I found. There is also another A and possibly part of an O just in front of the cut off notch and a circle P proof mark just behind the trigger guard on the bottom. The stock was evidently sanded...

    Oh, I did shoot it today. Everything functions perfectly and it shoots better than I can see so that's not an issue.
    Last edited by Brad in Idaho; 09-22-2018 at 07:13.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •