Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 14
  1. #1

    Default 50-70 2nd Allin 1866 2 band trapdoor

    I have been looking at this gun on EBay and am in a quandry about it. It appears to be a original 1866 cadet modified or a original 2 band 1866 modified. It does not have a filler piece in the stock forearm and the bands are 20" apart. The flats on the stock have been sanded down and rounded like a 45-70 and the wrist looks to be thinner too. Stock is complete bands, springs, trigger assy. ram rod spoon, ram rod, it is the wrong one, nose cap no but plate.
    1866 stock-2.jpg1866 stock-3.jpg1866 stock-4.jpg1866 stock-6.jpg
    Barrel is complete less breech block with hinge strap, extractors, rear sight, no front sight, tang, good bore, bore appears to be original SA sleeve but it is a 6 land and groove?
    Right now all the pieces stock, barrel, lock assy. can be had for $300 would need another 100 to finish.

    Will try to attach pictures.

  2. #2

    Default

    Here is some more of stock and barrel.1866 stock-11.jpg1866 barrel-3.jpg1866 barrel-4.jpg

  3. #3

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    My wife's house in Nebraska
    Posts
    4,976

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alfajim View Post
    And the last ones.1866 barrel-8.jpg
    As you can see, there are only Three lands and Three grooves.

  5. #5

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fred View Post
    As you can see, there are only Three lands and Three grooves.
    Yeah your right groves have to have two edges "little brain fart there" oops. Fred what is your opinion or feels about this gun?

    Jim
    Last edited by alfajim; 06-09-2017 at 12:58.

  6. Default

    Interesting topic. The filler is present if the stock was from the later 1864 stock that had band springs. The 1863 musket stock lacked these springs and so no filler was required. There are arguments as to which might be correct on a Springfield produced two band second Allin. When you find the stocks with the flats removed and the wrists thinned down all agree this is a Bannerman produced piece that is far less valuable. Neat project, but I would hunt for the "correct" stock.

  7. Default

    If you can find an old J DeChristopher catalog he does the best job of describing a two band first Allin. That's what got me started on the two band Allin quest!

  8. #8

    Default

    I decided to pass on this and put the money to my on going 45-70 project, refinishing the parts, stock repair and finish and finish the repair on the new 84" barrel chamber repair. Welding done lathe work now and chamber bore.

    Jim

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    My wife's house in Nebraska
    Posts
    4,976

    Default

    Yea, good idea. Anytime the stock has been power sanded off on the edges of the lock mortise and all, the stock is not salvageable. Run away from this one!

  10. #10

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kragrifle View Post
    If you can find an old J DeChristopher catalog he does the best job of describing a two band first Allin. That's what got me started on the two band Allin quest!
    That's an interesting gun. Have owned one for years - I think it is legit, but Al Frasca says no, based largely on the fact that the ramrod is not threaded. The 2-band 1866 has ALWAYS produced dissention, appearing as it does in a myriad of configurations - the only one of which that is "right" being the "Rifle, M1866, Short" of 1871. One of the anomalies is the rod length - it is set back like the 3-bander, not brought flush as in current production. Of course the 1867 Cadet is a completely different gun, and not a cut-down at all (and has a full-length rod unlike its' big brother).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •