to see over a flat top receiver, comfortably?
Steve
to see over a flat top receiver, comfortably?
Steve
The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson
Low to medium heights work fine on a flat top. Depends to some degree on the size of your scope objective. I have a 3-9x50 on ARMS medium height rings over a .308 flat top. Check rest is fine, no pad needed for a riser.
Those don't work good for me?
Steve
The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson
They make scope mounts specifically for flat top ARs. I have a few different mounts from Burris, Nikon and Aero Precision. For conventional rings I like Warne Ultra High Rings.
gwp
thank you, Steve
The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson
There are several lengthy threads on this on the National Match forum:
http://www.usrifleteams.com/forums/i...howtopic=32165
The link you post is for donations?
Steve
The Original Point and Click Interface was a Smith & Wesson
don't listen to the children here--for a flat top for us senior 's you need a 1" scope RISER then a med to high scope rings,,
that's one thing the unknowns will face later in life if they are lucky--STIFF NECKS--....THE AR is built for fungy-youngees
http://www.ebay.com/bhp/picatinny-rail-riser
Last edited by Litt'le Lee; 04-23-2017 at 11:01.
The is no " standard " for the terms Lo - Med - Hi . Each maker picks their own . I find about 22-25 mm from top of picatinny to bottom of tube comfortable . That's 37-40 MM to center of a 30mm tube . If you have a narrow face it may be a bit too tall . Padded cheek pieces may make this too low . 37 work good on a standard fixed / collapsible Ar15 . I put a 39 on my Barret M82A1 with an 1/8 - inch stick on cheek piece to protect from the Arizona sun on the metal cover that fits good .
What's with this METRIC stuff--America first !!!....I know TWO metrics-7.62 and 5.56 and the 7.62 is BS because 7.62
nato is 308 and elsewhere it's 310