Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default Colt 38 Detective Special

    I just acquired a 1948 Colt 38 Detective Special revolver that appears to be in average condition for its age. What tests and measurements are performed on a revolver to determine its shootability?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    9,256

    Default

    Things I look at when I check out a revolver.

    Open the cylinder and spin it. The cylinder should spin freely. If the cylinder doesn't spin the usual culprits are crud in the mechanism, damage to the crane by folks repeatedly snapping it shut with a flick of the wrist or a slightly bent ejector rod.
    With the cylinder shut, check the cylinder for fore and aft play. The cylinder should move little if any and should not drag on the barrel at all.
    Cock the hammer in the single action mode. The cylinder should lock in place over each chamber.
    Slowly pull the trigger in the double action mode while controlling the hammer with your thumb. The cylinder should lock into place just before the hammer falls on each chamber. Colts tend to lose timing with much use. Repairing this can be pricey.
    Cock the hammer then try to make it fall by applying thumb pressure on the back of the hammer spur. The hammer should not fall. If the hammer does fall its a sign of tampering and this one is a deal breaker.

    If it passes all of these you have an un "bubba-ed" in time revolver with no bent, damaged or seriously worn parts.
    Last edited by Art; 02-28-2017 at 06:49.

  3. #3

    Default

    Look at the gap between the face of the cylinder and the back end of the barrel. Now look straight up just above that gap to the bottom of the top strap. What your looking for on the bottom of the top strap is flame cutting. If the pistol has been shot enough the flame that jumps across the cylinder and the back of the barrel will start eroding the bottom of the strap. I've seen flame erosion so bad on some revolvers that a mechanical pencil lead will fit in the cut. Hope this helps.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Here are two pics of the Colt 38 Detective Special.
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Merc; 02-27-2017 at 08:37.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    image.jpg

    According to the various issued models of the Detective Specials shown on www.coltfever.com, it appears that my DS began its life as something other than a DS. The serial number is 500727 which, if it was a DS, indicates it was made in 1948 however the squared butt handle as shown in the photo indicates that design would have been used on the earliest DS model made between 1927-1933. HOWEVER, the s/n 500727 was also assigned to the following revolvers which indicates a high likelihood that it wasn't originally a DS. The best candidate would probably be a 1923 Army Special or Officers Model Special since all post-war models had rounded butt handles.

    Officers Model Special
    Police Positive Special
    Army Special
    1911 Military

    The front sight on the earlier DS issues was half moon-shaped while the front sight on my DS is the later ramp-shaped which indicates the original long barrel was replaced at some point in time with a newer 2 inch DS barrel. The hammer and trigger on my DS are checkered while the cylinder release knob is not checkered. The mix of components in this revolver reminds me of the way the war-time rebuilding processes were conducted on military rifles. Use anything from a pile of parts that fits and works.

    It's an interesting revolver that shoots well and I guess that's what counts.
    Last edited by Merc; 05-30-2017 at 11:23.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    There is some blueing loss to holster wear and someone scratched their initials on the left side of the gun (GP) and the date (3-29-52) probably marked for ID purposes. The gun passes all tests and measurements. Thanks for the help.
    Last edited by Merc; 02-27-2017 at 08:56.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    9,256

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Merc View Post
    There is some blueing loss to holster wear and someone scratched their initials on the left side of the gun (GP) and the date (3-29-52) probably marked for ID purposes. The gun passes all tests and measurements. Thanks for the help.
    Nice older D.S. It looks used but not abused. I think you did well.

  8. Default

    Merc--

    It looks like the leftside plate has been replaced. The bluing and wear should be same on those areas as these revolvers are blued at the same time. The markings looks like evidence markings that was scratched into the gun. Usually the initials of the investigator and the date the gun was seized by police. I have one like it, it sat in the police chief's desk drawer new until he retired. It has just a few scratches from the debris in his drawer.

    --fjruple

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fjruple View Post
    Merc--

    It looks like the leftside plate has been replaced. The bluing and wear should be same on those areas as these revolvers are blued at the same time. The markings looks like evidence markings that was scratched into the gun. Usually the initials of the investigator and the date the gun was seized by police. I have one like it, it sat in the police chief's desk drawer new until he retired. It has just a few scratches from the debris in his drawer.

    --fjruple
    I wondered about the marks. Thanks for the information.

  10. #10

    Default

    Aren't the Colt side plates serial numbered beneath to the gun? Might be worth a look-see. If it's a replacement, then another replacement wouldn't hurt.
    2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


    **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •