Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 27
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Jackson, Mississippi
    Posts
    5,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    There are some new IMR powders with an SC suffix, which means short cut. I'm going to get around to experimenting with 8208
    Phillip McGregor (OFC)
    "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Connecticut
    Posts
    1,899

    Default

    Shots on a 20 dot target at 100 yds. using .308 in M14 type scoped rifle the end of last month. BL-C 2 with 168 gr smk and 210M primers work great. Every shot to the left has been attributed to a hitch in the equipment. I stuck a new unitized gas cylinder on the rifle the night before the shoot and neglected to polish the front band where it contacts the tensioner. Correction has been made and next weekend improvements should be noted.



    This is a plot of the hits on the 1" targets for development purposes. Looks like I need to raise the elevation 1 click.



    This is my current precision M-14. Bula Defense XM21 with Bula med weight NM Barrel. Almost all parts are Bula. Scope is MK4 LRT 8.5 - 25 all sitting in a JAE gen 3 stock.



    Semper Fi
    Art
    Last edited by nf1e; 08-04-2016 at 02:08.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Southern Ohio
    Posts
    8,363

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PhillipM View Post
    There are some new IMR powders with an SC suffix, which means short cut. I'm going to get around to experimenting with 8208
    30 years ago IMR=8208 was surplus and I bought many an 8lb keg for $48 @ the Columbus, Ohio gun show. If I remember right it was pulldown from 5.56 tracer. Sure wish powder was available and reasonable now.
    Sam

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuna View Post
    Many military rifles have a rate of twist that is a bit fast for boat tail bullets and these rifles shoot better with flat based bullets. The M1 Garand used a 1 in 10 twist and the M14 used a 1 in 12 twist which would work better with the boat tail. I have heard some say oh my rifle likes boat tails and maybe it does but the vast majority don't.
    I knew there had to be a reason. I'm happy to be able to shoot these old rifles with a respectable degree of accuracy. They are a link to history and they impress me every time I take them to the range.

  5. #15

    Default

    Have used both stick (4895IMR) & both BLC@ & WW748 (ball) for M1, M1A,& ar15, for over the course NMC and hunting. Have had no problem withloads.
    Switched to the ball powder for ease of measuring through RCBS powder measure.

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Jackson, Mississippi
    Posts
    5,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jjrothWA View Post
    Have used both stick (4895IMR) & both BLC@ & WW748 (ball) for M1, M1A,& ar15, for over the course NMC and hunting. Have had no problem withloads.
    Switched to the ball powder for ease of measuring through RCBS powder measure.
    I'll give it that. I've loaded a bunch of what is supposed to be BLC (2) , surplus WCC 746, and it measures perfectly down to less than a tenth of a grain.
    Phillip McGregor (OFC)
    "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Jackson, Mississippi
    Posts
    5,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by S.A. Boggs View Post
    30 years ago IMR=8208 was surplus and I bought many an 8lb keg for $48 @ the Columbus, Ohio gun show. If I remember right it was pulldown from 5.56 tracer. Sure wish powder was available and reasonable now.
    Sam
    You just taught me something I did not know. Thank you!
    Phillip McGregor (OFC)
    "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Ypsilanti, MI
    Posts
    1,527

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Parashooter View Post
    What makes these called "M2 Match loads"? Is it the bullet weight (similar to USGI M2 AP)?
    Sorry Para, that is just how I refer to them... didn't mean to confuse no one. I started with M2 Ball cases (Lake City 68). The Match is because I am using the Nosler Match bullets and I'm shooting them in matches. I should have said "My Match Loads" and left the M2 out of it.
    "I was home... What happened? What the Hell Happened?" - MM1 Jacob Holman, USS San Pablo

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by S.A. Boggs View Post
    30 years ago IMR=8208 was surplus and I bought many an 8lb keg for $48 @ the Columbus, Ohio gun show. If I remember right it was pulldown from 5.56 tracer. Sure wish powder was available and reasonable now.
    Sam
    IMR8208 was developed by DuPont in the mid-1960s to resolve the shortcomings of the Olin WC846 ball powder in use with 5.56 ammo at the time. It was truly an American success story. By the late 1960s, Olin finally sorted out the issues and the cheaper WC844 emerged as the standard 5.56 powder. 8208 was discontinued and surplused.

    One or two lots of surplus 8208 became quite popular with the benchrest crowd. If memory serves, it was sold through Thunderbird Cartridge Company as TCC322. The small, short grain size was quite a revelation in that it metered very well- a great attribute to high speed factory loading and reloaders alike!

    When the surplus powder was used up, Hodgdon was approached to start production of a replacement. ADI in Australia was tapped to develope and produce a modernized version incorporating the same attributes of Varget such as temperature insensitivity. IMR8208XBR was the result.

    Loading data from Hodgdon shows the versatility of this powder which is slightly faster than 4895. Its slower burning cousins are Varget and H4350.
    Last edited by Ken in Iowa; 01-08-2017 at 06:43.

  10. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tuna View Post
    Stick powders were used from the very beginning of the 30-06. By WW2 the standard powder was IMR4895 a stick powder still used today by reloaders for their 30-06 ammo used in M1 Garands. IMR 4895 was the standard till the military switched production of the 30-06 to ball powders during Viet Nam.
    Ummm, Winchester used ball powder in WWII to load 303 and 30/06 ammunition. Hodgdon sold some surplus powder after the war as Ball C and 380 respectively. The modern newly manufactured commercial versions are BLC2 and H380.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •