Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 30
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    CHANDLER, AZ
    Posts
    115

    Default Winchester m12 trench on gun broker

    Can some of the advance SG collectors comment on the above auction on Gun Broker #557741776
    thanks
    BOB

  2. Default

    Do you see the punch mark next to the oval proof? Gun has been reworked by Winchester. The finish has been applied after proofing. A sure sign some has worked on this gun. Big Larry

  3. Default

    The finish appears characteristic of the light parkerizing seen on the late war Model 12's. What concerns me is that the thumbprint is evident, but partially obscured. What happened there on the right side of the receiver? Reworked by Winchester is not a deal killer, otherwise it looks like a decent trench. It will be interesting to see where the bids go...
    "There's a race of men that don't fit in,
    A race that can't stay still;
    So they break the hearts of kith and kin,
    And they roam the world at will." - Robert Service

  4. Default

    Hello,
    I'm not a Winchester collector just trying to learn more. Is it common for the U.S. marking to be out of alignment like this example? All the others I've seen have been much more uniform.

    Slide1.JPG
    Last edited by Keydet92; 05-21-2016 at 12:57.
    James,
    I'm a collector and researcher of Stevens 520/620 shotguns.

  5. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Keydet92 View Post
    Hello,
    I'm not a Winchester collector just trying to learn more. Is it common for the U.S. marking to be out of alignment like this example? All the others I've seen have been much more uniform.

    Slide1.JPG
    That is an absolutely correct factory parkerized gun. Larry, I am surprised you did not catch that but we are both getting old.
    It is NOT a re-work, in spite of the punch mark.
    I can not explain why the markings look off, but the gun is right as rain.
    It is a $3500-$5k gun. It would be way more but it does seem to have some wear issues.

  6. Default

    FYI those guns are always found with some blued small parts - the sling swivel in the stock, the action bar, the trigger and safety are most common.

    That was because after Winchester got permission from Uncle to cheapen the finish those parts are common to all M12 shotguns and they had so many of them on hand they did not need to make any more in the new finish.

  7. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SPEEDGUNNER View Post
    The finish appears characteristic of the light parkerizing seen on the late war Model 12's. What concerns me is that the thumbprint is evident, but partially obscured. What happened there on the right side of the receiver? Reworked by Winchester is not a deal killer, otherwise it looks like a decent trench. It will be interesting to see where the bids go...
    On the original parked guns the fingerprint is evident. Re-parking removes it forever, that is one of the ways you can tell it is original.
    Again, can not explain the apparent mis alignment of the markings, but it is very late and close to the end, the tools and jigs were probably getting worn out.

  8. Default

    Something else didn't look right on the U.S. markings that kept bothering me. The "S" stamp used is not symmetrical it has a definite top and bottom and the one on the parkerized gun in question (on the left) is upside down. The periods also appear to have been made with a punch. Did Winchester hand stamp these markings or did they use a roll stamp?
    Slide1~0.JPG

    Something about the ordnance bomb also doesn't look right but it's hard to tell with the scratch on it. Compare the flame pattern between the two bombs.
    Last edited by Keydet92; 05-22-2016 at 01:41.
    James,
    I'm a collector and researcher of Stevens 520/620 shotguns.

  9. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Keydet92 View Post
    Something else didn't look right on the U.S. markings that kept bothering me. The "S" stamp used is not symmetrical it has a definite top and bottom and the one on the parkerized gun in question (on the left) is upside down. The periods also appear to have been made with a punch. Did Winchester hand stamp these markings or did they use a roll stamp?
    Slide1~0.JPG


    Something about the ordnance bomb also doesn't look right but it's hard to tell with the scratch on it. Compare the flame pattern between the two bombs.

    You are absolutely correct. However looking at the serial number and the metal finish UNDER the parkerizing there is only one thing it can be. The factory parked guns had no final finishing and polishing so you can see the machine marks and "jittering". These are the ONLY Winchester guns EVER like this. There is no mistaking it. So the gun is what it is. As I stated before, I have no explanation for the funky looking markings, however this gun can simply not be faked.

  10. Default

    It does not even look like the correct bomb, so yes the markings are strange. But the overall manufacture and serial number of the gun indicate it is not fake. Re-parked guns are smooth, because they were polished out like commercial guns when made. This gun is "unfinished", they never polished out the machining marks.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •