Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 33
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Posts
    6,702

    Default Pre-War M1903 National Match rifles

    Although there is a fair amount of discussion about National Match M1903s, most of it is mainly about the rifles in the 1928-39 range, there is relatively little on those made before World War I. I had a chance to read an unpublished article written by our own John Beard about this subject.

    For one thing, as a rule pre-WWI National Match rifles were not sold but "loaned" to participants. As a result, there are few of them in private hands in original condition (John estimates a dozen or less. As I recall, there is one or two held by members of this forum, including me).

    Pre-WWI NM rifles are "missing" a number of the features which are seen on later National Match rifles; these include a) star gauge stamp on the muzzle crown; b) the serial number etched on the bolt; c) the serial number stamped on the bottom of the stock. The early NM does have a polished bolt and polished "raceways" and follower rib, among other features.

    One "specific" I found out was that, for the 1915 and 1916 National Matches, about 2200 National Match rifles were manufactured, all in serial number order. The order was from about 603,111 to about 605,347. The first half, according to John, were issued for the 1915 National Match, and the rest, during the 1916 National Matches. My rifle (605178) was apparently one of the 1916 rifles.

    What brought up all this to me was a gentleman on the Facebook M1903 forum reported obtaining M1903 #603758, one of the 1915 rifles. While it had a couple of the NM features, some parts like the stock had obviously been replaced. It has a 1914 barrel, which John said may have been original. Another obviously non-original feature was the extended "Air Service" magazine (The original discussion started as to whether it was an Air Service M1903, which of course, it was not)

    John and I both agreed that since nearly all of these rifles were turned in after use, and the U.S. was mere months away from participation in World War I, a large number of these rifles were probably "reintroduced" to use as service rifles, and, except for a few example, more or less disappeared.

    Here are some pictures of the gentleman's rifle from Facebook:

    12509048_963490537021684_969062179934518185_n.jpg12509248_963490557021682_6236932347932185849_n.jpg12576139_964836780220393_1219694686_n.jpg12606884_964836776887060_1445768334_n.jpg12625883_964836783553726_1278468631_n (2).jpg
    Last edited by Rick the Librarian; 01-26-2016 at 12:09.
    "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
    --C.S. Lewis

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Posts
    6,702

    Default

    For comparison, here is my 1916 National Match M1903. The rifle was obtained by the person who sold it to me from an elderly Black widow in the Washington DC-area whom he was moving out of her apartment. I would have been curious to know if her husband was in the service - possibly one of the pre-WWII "colored" regiments. I did not recognize it as a National Match rifle but John Beard did!!











    "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
    --C.S. Lewis

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,274

    Default

    One mistake made by Clark Campbell in his excellent books on the M1903 rifle, and perpetuated by Brophy in his book, was that M1903 rifles used in the National Matches prior to 1921 were nothing more than "selected" service rifles. This mis-perception resulted from all the 1921 publicity and promotion surrounding the introduction of National Match rifles for sale to the shooting public for the first time. Documents found in the Chief of Ordnance files at the National Archives firmly refute this perception.

    As Rick the Librarian pointed out, the pre-1921 National Match rifles were not available for sale. But they were National Match rifles in the tradition of the post-1921 rifles. And because few pre-WWI National Match rifles leaked out, the rifles are very scarce today.

    J.B.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    My wife's house in Nebraska
    Posts
    4,976

    Default

    John, would my 1920 National Match fall into the category of the early NM rifles, even though it's of Post War manufacture?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,274

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Fred View Post
    John, would my 1920 National Match fall into the category of the early NM rifles, even though it's of Post War manufacture?
    Your rifle, like the pre-WWI rifles, were not offered for sale to the public. But 1919 and 1920 NM rifles are, surprisingly, not very scarce. My speculation is that the 1919 and 1920 NM rifles were bought by military officers who were eligible to buy them. The Great War had cultivated a strong and widespread respect and interest in the Springfield rifle and post-war military officers who had served overseas wasted no time in scarfing them up!

    The 1919 and 1920 NM rifles are much like the pre-WWI rifles, except that the receivers were no longer casehardened and most remaining parts were parkerized and painted black instead of being richly blued.

    My 2c worth.

    J.B.

    p.s.,

    I have a well-used 1919 NM rifle in my collection that came with a National Match Special stock and USMC sights. I have little doubt that the rifle was bought by a USMC officer and target shooter.
    Last edited by John Beard; 01-26-2016 at 08:09.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    2,194

    Default

    John, as you know I'm a sucker for anything Marine. That 1919 sounds like a very nice rifle!

    And this is great info on the pre war NM rifles. It's a very interesting topic that I have to admit I'm very intrigued by. Thanks for posting Rick and John!

    On a side note, I know I've seen a lot of people argue online that the Marines couldn't buy their rifle, but as you said, the Marines could. I've searched the Marine Manual for almost the whole life of the 1903, and it's in there everytime.

    Last edited by cplnorton; 01-27-2016 at 03:15.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    My wife's house in Nebraska
    Posts
    4,976

    Default

    I wonder who the Officer was who bought my rifle. He didn't use it very much if any. He probably bought it in 1920 at Camp Perry. Possibly after using it there. I can't say for certain now, but I belive that the rifle arrived with a USMC sling that might've dated from the 1920's. I've since sold the sling. The rifle must've been stored away somewhere where dust couldn't get to it. Why would it have had a USMC 1907 sling put on it later if it wasn't being used much? I figure that the original owners daughter might've inherited it and she might've had only a daughter to hand it down to. I don't think anyone had fired it or even handled it much if any during that time. Heck, I've never fired it in the time it's been in the house.







    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by Fred; 01-27-2016 at 09:03.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Van Wert, OH
    Posts
    2,194

    Default

    I still love that Barstow Case.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    My wife's house in Nebraska
    Posts
    4,976

    Default

    You might've already read about how I got it then, but just in case you haven't, I bought that back in 1981 at the Marine Corps Supply Depot in Barstow from over the counter for $5.00 after noticing it hanging up on the wall directly behind the Supply Sergeant with a for sale tag on it. I asked him how much for it and he told me $5.00.
    I was there with another Lt. from Ft. Irwin, picking up something from the Marines there to take back to our unit in the 1/73 Armor.
    While I was in doing business with the Marine Sgt, the 1st Lt. that had come into town with me, an ex cop, stuck his head in the door and told me he was getting a ride back to the Fort with somebody else so to not bother looking for him. He told me he'd see me later back in the Motor Pool where he was going to be busy. I found him in the Motor Pool when I drove my jeep back, detailing identification numbers onto a freshly desert tan painted jeep that he told me he'd stolen from out front of the Marine Corp Supply Company where it'd been parked. That guy had some balls! He'd driven it through the desert, over Coyote Lake, and into the back gate of the Motor Pool. He obtained that jeep for his company use out and around the desert during our war excersizes.
    Anyway, I guess he pulled one over on the Marines that day. I got my rifle case, the Army got another jeep and the USMC got my $5.00.
    Last edited by Fred; 01-27-2016 at 02:54.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Posts
    6,702

    Default

    Like John says, 1919 and 1920 NM rifles weren't very rare. I found this 1919 NM online - a gentleman was using it as a "shooter" and was willing to trade another rifle I had plus some cash. Although I hope I'm wrong, I don't think it has the "painted" finish John mentions, although it appears to almost have a "varnishy" finish on the receiver. I haven't gathered the intestinal fortitude to try to remove it.

    IMG_0235 (1024x283).jpgIMG_0238 (1024x353).jpgIMG_0239 (1024x682).jpgIMG_0244 (1024x471).jpgIMG_0246 (1024x467).jpg
    "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
    --C.S. Lewis

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •