Page 9 of 10 FirstFirst ... 45678910 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 91
  1. Default

    Once smoked cigarettes, drank beer and whiskey in excess, drove unlimited late model dirt cars for 40 years, had many years where I drank 3 pots of black coffee a day, worked a super high stress job, had bacon everyday, ate the fat off my 1 pound steaks, have driven well over 100 mph on the public roads numerous times, fired tens of thousands of my own reloads in competition and practice in M1s, M1As, AR 15s built by myself, had several case separations, chased wild women and had unprotected sex plus a few dozen other behaviors I know were not wise at all. But dang I have never fired a single round out of a low number Springfield because it might be dangerous!
    Last edited by Hpmaster; 09-01-2016 at 05:01.

  2. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by PhillipM View Post
    If I remember, the CMP ground down the firing pins
    You remember right. Went to the North Store at the time and gave a script letter SA in the 21K range, off the top of my head, some consideration. $200 at the time? About a decade ago. I was after other guns so I left it behind. Which is fine as I came into a more interesting LN SA later.

    Selling them at all was stupid. A ground firing pin isn't going to even slow anyone down. Myself I'm glad they did but it was particularly stupid. With the product liability lawsuits in modern America they left themselves open. If somebody replaced the firing pin in one of those and injured themselves seriously they'd take the CMP to the cleaners. Selling it with a ground firing pin isn't going to be an even remotely successful defense. Val Forget sold a guy cartridges for an ancient Rolling Block back in the '60s and the guy lost an eye shooting a gimpy gun. That guy took Val to the cleaners. Cases are even more likely to succeed today. Hot coffee at McDonalds? File suit. Hurt yourself riding your lawnmower? File suit over lack of seat belts. I do not agree with lawsuits that stupid people are able to win but the realist in me knows the CMP was particularly stupid on selling those.

  3. Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hpmaster View Post
    Once smoked cigarettes, drank beer and whiskey in excess, drove unlimited late model dirt cars for 40 years, had many years where I drank 3 pots of black coffee a day, worked a super high stress job, had bacon everyday, ate the fat off my 1 pound steaks, have driven well over 100 mph on the public roads numerous times, fired tens of thousands of my own reloads in competition and practice in M1s, M1As, AR 15s built by myself, had several case separations, chased wild women and had unprotected sex plus a few dozen other behaviors I know were not wise at all. But dang I have never fired a single round out of a low number Springfield because it might be dangerous!
    Do you specialize in false analogies?

    There is absolutely nothing to be gained from shooting an LN SA '03. With a caveat. Assuming you can blow the money on a gun that shouldn't be shot at all that money, less in fact, could be used to acquire a NS '03. Same exact gun. The Armory assured it. If you go through the list of items you listed there is zero direct alternatives which are identical. A tofu chunk isn't a steak, banana peels aren't tobacco, wine isn't whiskey, driving 30mph isn't driving over 100mph, and a squirt gun isn't an M1.

    Do you specialize in false analogies?

    If you had 10 P-51 Mustangs out back, lucky you, and 1 of the 10 was known for having the wings come off in flight - would that be the one you'd select? That wouldn't be too bright.

  4. Default

    At the risk of further igniting a volatile subject, and mind you I'm going to do this off the top of my head without even bothering to check the documents I have to confirm it, the RIA rifles weren't affected.

    Heat treating was basically a lie that Hatcher perpetuated. Covered that, and the real problem, in my book.

    RIA didn't buy their steel from the same supplier and didn't get the same lots. When they pulled the -800,000 SAs they didn't list the RIA rifles as a problem. Circa 1920ish? In a document around here.

    Shooting a heat treated '03, when the NS ones are readily available, is dumb. If you're the obstinate type - get the RIA edition.
    Last edited by 5MadFarmers; 09-01-2016 at 11:23.

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    We encounter enough risks in everyday life. To lose an eye because of a desire to shoot an antique rifle that was made before the art of metallurgy became a science isn't a risk worth taking.

  6. #86

    Default

    It took a lot more that a cast bullet load to blow that receiver! I would bet it was a case full of pistol powder.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA
    Posts
    1,685

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by musketshooter View Post
    It took a lot more that a cast bullet load to blow that receiver! I would bet it was a case full of pistol powder.
    Or, maybe an accidental double powder load. It's a good idea to weigh each reloaded cartridge on a digital scale to guard against the possibility of a double load.
    Last edited by Merc; 09-01-2016 at 06:48.

  8. #88
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Dagsboro, Delaware
    Posts
    1,882

    Default

    If one had two double loads of ammo each fired in a sht and the other in a dht, both rifles would blow up. But the sht rifle would suffer more catastrophically than the dht. This infers that the shooter of a sht rifle that blows would suffer more catastrophic injury than the shooter firing the dht.

    I wonder if this analogy is appropriate..... firing a sht rifle is like driving a car without a seat belt. If a crash occurs, risk of injury is greater; firing a dht rifle is like driving a car wearing seat belts. If a crash occurs, risk of injury is inherently less.

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Jackson, Mississippi
    Posts
    5,938
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I have never seen a report of a SHT blowing up with good factory ammo. In modern times its always been some dummy that was reloading with a reduced charge that would allow the case to be double charged.

    I have SA 36018 with the original bolt. Glass on glass does not adequately describe how smooth it is. It had been in a closet for 60 years or so and one day I took it to the range to show it off to my buddies and had a what the heck moment and shot a round through it just to hear it go bang. Very satisfying! I've no need to shoot it again, it fires like my other 1903's.

    My shooter is a MK1. I figure if a Hatcher hole is good, a Pedersen ejection port is better.

    An A3 is just sticky compared to the case hardened rifles.
    Phillip McGregor (OFC)
    "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

  10. Default

    MCA Sports http://www.mcace.com/ makes cartridge adapters that allow you to fire 30 Carbine out of a 30/06.
    Last edited by blackhawknj; 09-02-2016 at 03:37.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •