Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. Default 1899 rear sight question

    Newbie here. Hello, everyone, and thank you all for the wealth of knowledge collected here.

    I saw a 1899 carbine on an auction site. After looking more closely, the rear sight is the 1896 rifle sight. Could that ever have been a legitimate arsenal installation? Or does it speak of a bubba job? I used the search function, but after gleaning through many threads I gave up and posted.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Northeast Connecticut
    Posts
    819

    Default

    A rifle sight on a carbine would not be characteristic of authentic arsenal work.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Durand. MI.
    Posts
    6,778

    Default

    I do not know if and doubt a 1896 sight was originally used on a 99 carbine. However a 96 carbine sight is rare and costs go over 500 for one. Of course carbine sights were always put on carbines, no matter the year. The hand guard must also be considered. 90% of 96 carbines will have rifle sight on them so I would not call it a Bubba job. You use what you have some times.

  4. #4

    Default

    Yes, there was a period of time when 1896C sights were used on M1899 carbines, and there is a special humped handguard for that exact application, on the 32" stock.

    That said, 1896C sights - for any intended usage - have been in very short (near non-existent) supply for a great many years, so 1896R sights are frequently found in their place, as people did what they had to do to complete their arm - so, it is probably more much more a case of desperation rather than Bubba.

  5. Default

    A few more things-the 1896 style sight used on the 1899 carbines will only have the 1900 dated cartouche and will be around 280K-300K (look in Mallory's book for a better range). When this style sight was used this later group of carbines (and rifles) the binding knob was increased in size so that most of the 1896 carbine sights out there will not be correct for the 1899 carbine. Finally, of the 15-20 carbines of this style that I have seen, all have had the lighter colored walnut or even a few with the "Italian Walnut" wood.

  6. #6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Kragrifle View Post
    A few more things-the 1896 style sight used on the 1899 carbines will only have the 1900 dated cartouche and will be around 280K-300K (look in Mallory's book for a better range). When this style sight was used this later group of carbines (and rifles) the binding knob was increased in size so that most of the 1896 carbine sights out there will not be correct for the 1899 carbine. Finally, of the 15-20 carbines of this style that I have seen, all have had the lighter colored walnut or even a few with the "Italian Walnut" wood.
    +1, thanks for the additional clarification, with which I totally agree.

  7. Default

    Thank you, gents, for your helpful and informative replies.

Similar Threads

  1. 1899 Krag Carbine Question
    By Jkibler2 in forum Krag Rifle
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-07-2014, 07:27
  2. sc 1903a3 Rear Sight Repair Question
    By Dave B from western NY in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-11-2014, 02:59
  3. 1903 rear sight fit question
    By islandhopper in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 03-31-2014, 06:41
  4. USMC front sight and modification to REAR sight
    By pelago in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 10-28-2013, 04:39
  5. NM rear sight question
    By boykin in forum 1911/1911A/Service Pistols
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-30-2013, 02:01

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •