Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 42
  1. #21
    leftyo Guest

    Default

    put enough pressure to it, and brass will flow wherever it can from any part of the casing that isnt 100% supported.

  2. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Midwest/South in Winter
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by cwbuff View Post
    He had read on the web that some barrels on this gun were over sized and to use the larger bullet. So that is what he did. But he did so without slugging the bore to see what the barrel diameter actually was. DUMB - but lucky.
    Yes, he missed the part of slugging the barrel, and that was a big mistake. One of my problems with the web is there are many subjects that are stretched to the point of rediculousness! Should one believe what is published on the web? NO, read a fricken manual before you go half cocked over some tall tail that some arm chair expert types out as gospel.
    For GOD'S sake, don't believe anyone, check out published loads using more than one manual so you can see if you have a misprint and buy software such as Quick Load to further your reloading practices in a safe manner.
    Everyone makes mistakes, but mistakes can be avoided if you think before you act, so for the love of Jesus, Mary and Joseph, just do that, Think Before You Act!
    Matt
    "When you tax away the rewards of effort, you destroy the motivation to achieve"

  3. #23
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Old Dominion
    Posts
    275

    Default

    I don't know how much pressure that case withstood, but it must have been quite high. It speaks volumes about the quality of RWS brass.
    "Man is not free unless government is limited." -- Ronald Reagan

  4. Default

    How do you determine the beginning of high pressure? The answer, no one measures.

    There is case head diameter, there is case head thickness, there is primer pocket diameter and there is flash hole diameter. I have a flash hole gage. I have tested suspect receivers with test loads that had the same appearance as the case heads posted by the OP.

    F. Guffey

  5. Default

    I have tested suspect receivers with test loads that had the same appearance as the case heads posted by the OP.
    With one big exception, the case heads got hammered, the hammering flattened the case head to the point is was difficult to read the head stamp. A shooter borrowed a rifle from a friend, purchased ammo then proceeded to the range. After the first shot he went to a smith for help in extracting the case. Seems he purchased 308 W ammo for a 25/06. The case head was flattened to the point it could not be read. The smith suspected a mistake was made, he asked to see the receipt for the ammo and what was left (19 rounds) of the new box of ammo,

    Point: If the sales slip read 25/06 and the new box of ammo was 308 W blame the sales person, the sales slip and new box of ammo agreed, both were for 308W.

    F. Guffey
    Last edited by fguffey; 04-27-2014 at 05:26.

  6. Default

    This always reminds me of the guy that chambered his 6.5 Arisaka chambered for .30-06. He said it kicked like hell, but the .308 bullets made it down the .264 barrel. The American Rifleman got the rifle and showed bullets fired through the rifle which were almost 2 inches long after being squeezed down.

    I agree that most cases I have seen with blown primers have most of the case markings wiped off.

  7. Default

    Johnny P.
    This always reminds me of the guy that chambered his 6.5 Arisaka chambered for .30-06
    Kicked like a mule, the pressure was equal between the front of the chamber and the rear of the chamber, no recoil, then the reduced diameter of the barrel would control gas escape like an orifice. Those that have made mistakes normally recognize a difference in sound and less recoil. Those that make and design bullets walk the range.

    The shooter that fired the 308w in the 25/06 started another rumor about the bullet and how long it was when it left the barrel. I disagreed, the difference in the three hours it took to remove the case and destroying the rifle was the choice of bullets. Had he spent a few more dollars for a box of ammo with good bullets he would have destroyed the rifle.

    Factors and off the lands, the 308 W had a jump meaning it had a running start. Time as a factor, had the 308 W bullet been close the lands he would have destroyed the rifle.

    F. Guffey

  8. #28
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Midwest/South in Winter
    Posts
    404

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny P View Post
    This always reminds me of the guy that chambered his 6.5 Arisaka chambered for .30-06. He said it kicked like hell, but the .308 bullets made it down the .264 barrel. The American Rifleman got the rifle and showed bullets fired through the rifle which were almost 2 inches long after being squeezed down.

    I agree that most cases I have seen with blown primers have most of the case markings wiped off.
    I sure wish you could find that article and post it here as Mr. FG doesn't believe it happened, he called it a rumor. I remember FG years ago on this forum, he left for years. Better to just ignore him, than try and make sense with his rants.
    Matt
    "When you tax away the rewards of effort, you destroy the motivation to achieve"

  9. Default

    I sure wish you could find that article and post it here as Mr. FG doesn't believe it happened,
    Matt Anthony, are you that desperate for attention?

    A picture of two case heads . one fired with normal pressure, the other fired with excessive pressure and designed to lead members to believe the excessive pressure had no effect on the case head stamping.

    I have test fired receivers that were believed to be suspect, the case heads compressed and increased in diameter, the flash hole increased in diameter, the primer pocket increased in diameter, at the same time the case body locked onto the chamber and because you are so desperate for attention tell me what happened next.

    I have Japanese rifles, two are in parts, have you ever taken a Japanese rifle apart, it is something like seeing something so ugly you just can not get it out of your mind. There is something about the receiver that is a conflict about what you see and what you hear.

    As I have always said "forget the receiver and that stuff you hear about the strongest receiver in the world, give me the cases"

    Yes, I found the old forum disturbing, I left, many others left. You did not care enough about the old forum to get involved. Then the archives, all gone, except, I made drafts.

    F. Guffey
    Last edited by fguffey; 04-29-2014 at 06:32. Reason: change . to ?

  10. #30
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Northeast Connecticut
    Posts
    819

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Matt Anthony View Post
    . . . Better to just ignore him, than try and make sense with his rants.
    Matt
    By not following your own advice to ignore him you've managed to set him off again! Listen, it's clear FG has some cognitive issues - but he also has considerable experience and sometimes hides useful information among the tangles of his imagination. If you can get past the masses of chaff, there's occasionally a grain of wisdom in there.

Similar Threads

  1. Reloading for the AR 15
    By JohnMOhio in forum The Reloading Bench
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 01-22-2014, 03:14
  2. Decision Flow Charts
    By Maury Krupp in forum On the Firing Line
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-16-2010, 05:29

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •