Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Weight Gain

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The dry side of Washington St.
    Posts
    606

    Default Weight Gain

    Traveling for work right now so I'm staring at hotel walls thinking of obscure things....

    Does anybody happen to know an accurate weight of the rod bayonet 1903 compared to a pre-WWII M1903 plus bayonet and scabbard?

    It would also be interesting (at least for me) to know the weight change between an early Remington M1903 and a 03A3.

    It seems like over the years there were many tiny incremental changes to the 1903 that added weight that I'm wondering what the cumulative effect was. Off the top of my head I can think of : added Bayonet and scabbard, added stock bolts, removed lighting cuts on the cut-off housing, removed holes from the front sight base, added material to the bottom and sides of the rear sight base, added flat knobs to the ladder sights, added material to the sear, added scant and C stocks, and added material to the milled trigger guard.

    In the 1903 the only thing I can think of that actually reduced weight was removal of the bolt stop. I'm guessing that the 03A3 platform moved back to a lighter design.

    Hopefully somebody has some accurate numbers. I realize that the wood density is a variable.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    1,030

    Default

    My CN 1908 stock sure does seem light compared to an A3 stock. I'll bet the RB rifles were close in weight to a pre-WWI '03. I'd guess the heaviest would be the Rem M1903 without stamped parts or a fingergroove stock? Wonder how that compares to a M1903A3?

    Mike

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The dry side of Washington St.
    Posts
    606

    Default

    Mike,
    I suspect you are correct about the RB vs. a pre WWI until you add the bayonet and scabbard. I also agree that the Rem M1903 will all milled parts is the all time heaviest, but a true A1 must be pretty darn close with the heavier stock.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    NW Washington State
    Posts
    6,702

    Default

    The "standard" I heard about pre-WWII M1903s was 8.69 pounds, less sling and bayonet. No idea on the RB.
    "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
    --C.S. Lewis

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Between the two Vancouvers
    Posts
    436

    Default

    Attachment 25379
    Balance wieght scale accurate to 1/4 pound.
    Last edited by BEAR; 01-11-2014 at 09:50.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The dry side of Washington St.
    Posts
    606

    Default

    Thanks Bear. Decent weight improvement on the A3.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Posts
    2,274

    Default

    You must have really been bored.

    Condolences.

    J.B.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    The dry side of Washington St.
    Posts
    606

    Default

    Ha! You are spot on John. Emporia Kansas, single digit temps, missed flights.....

    All better now.

Similar Threads

  1. Taurus paper weight
    By joem in forum Revolvers
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-08-2014, 09:48
  2. M-1 Bullet Weights--Any clear accuracy champ by weight?
    By Amanda4461 in forum The Reloading Bench
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 04-29-2013, 02:08
  3. adding weight to a 1903 trigger?
    By snell in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 04-12-2013, 06:26
  4. What weight bullet is best for two different AR's?
    By Gunnut in forum The Reloading Bench
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 02-17-2013, 05:31

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •