I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.
having already said that the thread sorta went off on a discussion of unlikely alternatives, I'll point out that it wasn't me who lead the parade. I was and am willing to discuss alternatives proposed in the process, though my own belief, based on what can be seen in the photo, has not changed: the rifle shown is most likely a sporterized 1903 Springfield.
mhb - Mike
Sancho! My armor!
agreed
I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.
What Japanese soldier would carry a .22 rifle in combat?
that anyone suggested the rifle was actually a .22, though it could have been. It appears to be a sporting rifle, and speculation was that it was a sporterized 1903 Springfield in .30-06.
The rifle is almost certainly a captured or surrendered piece, and not what the Japanese soldier would have used in combat.
The topic got sidetracked on the features of the stock, itself, which led to a discussion of the various types of 'sporter-appearing' stocks used by Springfield Armory on its NRA Sporter rifles in cal. .30 and its several models of .22 rifles: both calibers were furnished with very similar stocks.
However, at the end, we don't have enough information to say with certainty exactly what the pictured rifle is, except that it is not a purely military type.
mhb - Mike
Sancho! My armor!
Nothing about the photo would prevent it from being a .22 or any other form of craziness. I have seen plenty of soldiers holding up some seriously stupid war trophies. You don't get to pick and choose what the enemy leaves behind.
I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.