Results 1 to 4 of 4
  1. Default Glass bedding or Pillar bedding, which is better?

    I am planning on getting some work done to my 700 cdl. I wanted to get it glass bedded, but I've read the the pillars are more stable. The gun is going to be a field gun. I floated the barrel already and want to the rest of the way.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elliston, Ohio
    Posts
    3,028

    Default

    Pillar bedding by far! And don't forget to torque the action screws.

  3. #3

    Default The 700 seems to react better to the pillar bedding..

    have a 1970's M70 that was glass-bedded as has not deteriorated.

    Now a another M70 that will bed and am considering using pillars for that with the full action bedding.

    Did a Anschtuz 1413 with aluminum pillars back in the 90's and shoots like a charm, need to do a
    Marlin M2000 for improving group size.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    AZ Mountains USA
    Posts
    884

    Default

    Glass bedding and pillar bedding are two different things. Pillars prevent the stock material from compressing under the torque of the action screws and are not really necessary in some stocks. Pillars, by themselves, are not meant to replace regular glass bedding. Most shooters that use pillars will also glass bed the action, including a light skim of glass over the pillars. The combination, if done correctly, should result in stress free bedding that will not change.

    Ray

Similar Threads

  1. 1965 Ishy - Looking For Glass
    By GS455 in forum SMLE (Lee Enfield)/Enfield/British Arms
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-26-2014, 12:03
  2. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-09-2013, 02:05

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •