Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread: Sks Question

  1. Default Sks Question

    I know this isn't an SKS forum but i figured I would give it a shot. I have a couple of SKS's Chinese . One has a what looks to be a fiberglass stock and a blade bayo the other looks to have a plastic stock with the spike style bayo. Both are numbers matching. one with plastic stock doesn't have any import marks and the one with fiberglass stock and spike bayo is import marked and says made by Norinco. Is one more valuable than the other? Are these more collectible because of the stocks?
    Any help would be great!!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    9,256

    Default

    Having the bayonets attached adds to the collectability, most Chicom imported models do not have the bayonets. The red plastic (jungle) stocks used to go for a bit of a premium. Screwed in barrels sell for a bit more than the "crush fit" examples. I would give a slight edge in collectability to the plastic stock version.

    Without seeing your rifles, all matching rifles with the bayonets and screw in barrels in good condition I would estimate value at $350.00 $400.00 where I live. Where you live does matter because price will vary with location, along with how anxious you are to make a sale.

    On the import marks, on some of these rifles the import marks are very faint and on the barrel over the bayonet mounting.
    Last edited by Art; 03-25-2013 at 01:41.

  3. Default

    Art, Thanks for the info. Not really looking to sell right now. They are both in about 99% condition. Both have screw in barrels. As far as import mark I see one plan as day on one rifle but I looked really hard on the other and see nothing!

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    South West Virginia
    Posts
    1,173

    Default

    Who made the one with no mark? If it was made outside of the US the law says it has to have the mark. The only exception to this I have ever seen on a SKS was one that was taken home from Nam by an officer and I am not sure that was even legal.
    "In God We Trust"

  5. #5

    Default

    Anyone could bring back an SKS from Nam as long as they had the proper paper work. A few AK-47's made it back too. Some with paper work from early on in the war and some without paper work later on. Basically if your CO signed off on it you were all set and the firearm returned home with you or was shipped home.

  6. Default

    I thought the same thing when I got it. Wasn't sure why it didn't have an import mark.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,088

    Default

    I believe the importer marking of firearms was enacted by the Gun Control Act of 1968.
    Last edited by gwp; 03-26-2013 at 10:19.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    9,256

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by gwp View Post
    I believe the importer marking of firearms was enacted by the Gun Control Act of 1968.
    The GCA of 1968 banned the importation of milsurps. The import marking was required when that provision was removed and Milsurps began to be imported again about 20 years ago.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Baird, Texas
    Posts
    9,753

    Default

    Due to hysteria and stupidity SKS prices are up around $700 now. The $350 qouted previously is the correct SANE price. Even that seems high to me but it is the normal average.
    I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.

  10. Default

    Thank you

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •