Thinking about a Krag

[bandit1978]

I have a chance at a Krag SN 266584. It is carbine length but I'd guess it is cut down. Other than a scope base drilled into the side of the receiver, it seems original. It is $250. I fiqured it was worth it just to have a Krag. Anybody offer any information?

[ebeeby]

THe Krag rifle is a delight to shoot and in the case of the 1896 I have, a tack driver. Why not hold out for a rifle rather than a cut-down?

[Dick Hosmer]

I do not see that anything is gained by buying a cut-down, and, the scope holes are the kiss of death for ever reselling it when you come to hate it, as you will. There is a reason why it is so cheap! Save your money until you can afford a nice rifle in the $800-$900 range. You will much happier in the end, I promise you. You will have something to be proud of.

[IditarodJoe]

Welcome to the forum, bandit1978.

Somewhere there's a "right" owner for every rifle and you'll have to decide whether this one will bring you $250 worth of pleasure. I personally agree with Dick. The novelty of owning a cut down Krag with a drilled receiver would wear off pretty quickly for me.

I know that Mr. Hosmer has owned some extremely nice rifles in his time and I expect that both his standards and his means exceed those of some of us here, but I'd recommend continuing to save until you can get a full-length rifle with an intact receiver and a good bore. In the meanwhile, use the time to learn more about these historic firearms and continue to shop - not necessarily to find that perfect deal but rather to learn the market.

That's my .02. Best of luck to you.

[bandit1978]

Thanks for the input. I am going to take your advice...

[Dick Hosmer]

Thanks IJ, but you, and a lot of other people, might be surprised. Standards possibly, especially as to authenticity/originality, but means (I've never been able to afford truly high-grade guns) no. I do not have a formal degree, and my peak annual salary, were I to reveal it, would be laughed at by many.

Luck has played a huge part over the years, but I attribute a lot of whatever success may have been achieved to an ironclad focus, and voracious study. There were very few purchases where I did not know a good deal more about the gun than the seller. Also, note that I started a long time ago - prices have risen greatly.

[jon_norstog]

Bandit,

I'm going to take a contrary position here. A bit. I agree about the holes, they would be a deal-breaker for me. But I think a cutdown rifle makes a pretty decent hunting rifle. And at the prices carbines are getting these days, why take one into the woods? The trick is finidng a cutdown with a decent barrel and good sights. I am partial to the Pacific aperature sight that mounts in the magazine cutoff slot.

At the same time, I think I might look around for a decent long rifle. If I find one, fine, if not, that's OK too. Same goes for that 1884 Trapdoor. Dick says that's the one to get if you're looking for a shooter.

jn

[gnoahhh]

From a collectors standpoint, the fact that it's a cut down and d/t'ed is a deal breaker- I agree. But, such guns definitely have their place in the overall scheme of things. If it has a good bore and not 'ugli-fied' any more than having been cut down, it would make a dandy hunting rifle- one that I wouldn't cringe and go running for the truck with if it started to rain. Accidentally dropping it or scraping it on barbed wire wouldn't have me gnashing my teeth either. Remember too that because so many sustained 'damage' at the hands of Bubba over the years, the nice original ones we have in our collections have serious value.

[Kragrifle]

As much as I hate to see it, Krags have dropped off in price lately (notice I did not say value). I just saw a beautiful 1902 dated rfile sell for $750! Forget the cut down, buy a nice Krag and you will never regret it. May even increase in value if Mr. Obama ever goes away.

[psteinmayer]

My first Krag was purchased in a pawn shop in Mississippi (I was stationed there at the time) for $175. It was a sporterized cutdown 1898 (at the time, I thought it was a true carbine... but I didn't know anything back then) and I purchased it because I knew about my dads 1898 rifle. I absolutely LOVED that sporter, and I took every opportunity to go shooting. A few years later, dad gave me the 1898 rifle... and my sporter has taken up residence as a safe queen. I still love it, and do still shoot it occasionally, but it's no true rifle. If I was still hunting, I would use the sporter... but for shooting paper at the range, my money goes to the 1898 rifle every day and twice on sunday!!! I absolutely love shooting in the CMP National Matches, and I plan to shoot in some other matches this year too.

Just my two cents worth!
Paul