While it may (or may not) be generally true that "most" A4 bolts work in "most" 03 Actions without the cut, my friends A4 bolt (from a REAL A4) would not completely close in my unmodifided A3 action without the bolt root cut, even with a genuine, US GI A4 cut stock installed.
And with Remington, by 1943 only doing "Essential Operations" to the 03 and 03A3 to speed up and cheapen production (no lightning cuts on the rear sight base of a Remington 03, for example) why on earth would they add an additional, unnecessary cut to the reciever that they did NOT have to?? Not only do they do the cut for the bolt root, they had to finish the edge of the reciever with a curved corner. If making the bolt correctly completely solved this problem, how come Remington set up to do this cut on three different runs of rifles? If it wasn't needed, why was it done? CC
Last edited by Col. Colt; 10-31-2012 at 09:34.
Colt, Glock and Remington factory trained LE Armorer
LE Trained Firearms Instructor