Results 1 to 6 of 6
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Wellborn Florida
    Posts
    155

    Default carbine comparison

    Took a nice No5 Jungle carbine and an M38 Mosen to the range yesterday. Wanted to really punish the shoulder! A recoil comparison subjectively was that the jungle carbine's rubber butt plate was more cosmetic than real aid, and for my money it was more recoil than the Russian by a small margin. That flash hider did make a difference though. The M38 really burped white flame. I used surplus ammo for both. both shot about 2 to 3 inch groups at 100 yards with a flyer or two, but that's the individual rifles, not relevant to compare the breeds on accuracy. A fun day overall, but about 20 rounds from either was plenty.

    Respects to all and Merry Christmas as well.
    Contempt of congress, 350 million co-defendents

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elliston, Ohio
    Posts
    3,028

    Default

    The No.5 was NOT designed for "Jungle Fighting", but for Airborne troops. That flat hockey puck butt-plate isn't intended to do one damn thing to help the shooter, but rather to avoid punching holes in the tender decks of transport aircraft and especially gliders.

    And while interesting, your post really doesn't belong in a forum dedicated to competition shooting, since neither firearm is much more than a bullet hose!

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Wellborn Florida
    Posts
    155

    Default

    Humble appoligies, Seemed like an interestng range topic!
    Contempt of congress, 350 million co-defendents

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elliston, Ohio
    Posts
    3,028

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by 2flasargent View Post
    Humble appoligies, Seemed like an interestng range topic!
    Oh it is.....but it'll do a LOT better over on Gun Talk, which is also more where it belongs! But I DO have a question for you....what's an "M38"? The M44 I know and have several of, the Bulgarian M59 I know and have one, the M30 I know and have a bunch of, the M1891 I know and have a crap-load of, including a Remington and a Westinghouse, an M39 I know and have a couple of beauties (including a 1971 Sako!)....but no M38.
    Last edited by John Kepler; 12-22-2011 at 06:02.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Wellborn Florida
    Posts
    155

    Default

    That's what I identified my carbine as per other websites but may be off in nomenclature . It is about identical to an M44, but w/o ever having provision for a bayonet. I understood they were Cossack issue, who of course carried a Shaska sword instead.
    http://russian-mosin-nagant.com/russian3.html
    ~2/3 the way down.
    Respects
    Contempt of congress, 350 million co-defendents

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Elliston, Ohio
    Posts
    3,028

    Default

    The "91/59" or M59 is a bit lower down, and what I'm more familiar with. As far as "functionality", it's a distinction without any difference.....more damn noise and flash than anything not crew-served and on tracks!

Similar Threads

  1. Singer grip comparison
    By Tommy2guns in forum 1911/1911A/Service Pistols
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 09-08-2014, 07:24
  2. Photo comparison - shooting position
    By Liam in forum Sniper Rifles
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 01-08-2011, 01:43

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •