Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1

    Default Letter from the USMC about health concerns

    I just got a letter from the USMC about a health questionnaire they will be sending me. According to this letter from Lt. Gen. Panter, deputy commandant, Installations Logistics, this applies to Marines and Navy men who were stationed at Lejeune and Pendleton. I had heard about carbon tet in the ground water at Lejeune but this is the first time I have heard Pendleton mentioned. Anybody know what they are fishing for?
    Last edited by Griff Murphey; 10-11-2011 at 04:19.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    1,088

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oceanside, Ca
    Posts
    5,863

    Default

    Simple comparison between two major military installations to see if there is anything the same or different in people's health.

    Now here's where I see the WEIRD part. Given that military families were uprooted every 3-4 years and sent to a new installation, many were stationed at BOTH Lejeune and Pendleton. So do they comprise a 3rd group?
    "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

  4. #4

    Default

    This reminds me of the Atomic vets. I had an uncle, LTJG dental officer on USS CUMBERLAND SOUND, control ship for the Bikini nuke shots, died of lung cancer in his early 70s. Our local paper just had an article about a Marine named Tyler, who was in 3-5; they were put 5 miles from ground zero for shot HOOD in. 1955. So far he is ok.... That is the kicker on these deals.

  5. #5

    Default

    Got the Survey today, 10-24-11. One interesting point, it asks what year an individual may have been in Vietnam but only allows '65-'71. In other words, no consideration for anyone in an embassy job or like me in the evacuation in '75 (granted, no boonie time and thereby much reduced risk).

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Oceanside, Ca
    Posts
    5,863

    Default

    "One interesting point, it asks what year an individual may have been in Vietnam but only allows '65-'71."

    Sounds like an "agent orange" question.
    "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

  7. #7

    Default

    No agent orange dispersed after 1971 by the VNAF?I would not bet on it.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    North East Texas
    Posts
    868

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Griff Murphey View Post
    Got the Survey today, 10-24-11. One interesting point, it asks what year an individual may have been in Vietnam but only allows '65-'71. In other words, no consideration for anyone in an embassy job or like me in the evacuation in '75 (granted, no boonie time and thereby much reduced risk).
    I would surmise they chose the years 1965-1971 because the first Marine ground combat units entered Vietnam in 1965 and the last of them departed in 1971. The evacuation in 1975 involved a relatively small number of Marines who were "in country" for a very short period of time.

  9. #9

    Default

    No way am I comparing my relatively minuscule potential exposure to agent orange to someone who lived in it. But should something come up later, I did drink the potentially contaminated water on the ships at Phan Rhang and Vung Tau, which, by the way, was just reprocessed seawater which flowed, ultimately, from in-country.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    McHenry County, IL
    Posts
    5

    Default

    I haven't opened mine yet

Similar Threads

  1. Any concerns for using LC 69 brass...
    By jjrothWA in forum The Reloading Bench
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11-02-2014, 10:00
  2. Took a mental health day
    By pmclaine in forum M1903/1903A3/A4 Springfield
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-23-2013, 01:00

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •