45-70 cartridge belt

[RCS]

Attachment 9175Attachment 9176Attachment 9177Attachment 9178My friend has had this cartridge belt since the early 1970's, could anyone tell if it is original or not ?

[sdkrag]

I would say it's o.k.. There wasn't a lot of fake stuff back then.

[5MadFarmers]

Nice belt. Is real.

[Fred]

I'm pretty sure it's original. There were repro US buckles in the 70's, but this isn't one of them. It has the correct width to the buckle unlike the repro's which were wider and it hasn't the textured background behind the U.S. either. It fits the bill for an original.

[Sunray]

How many loops? Your buddy's belt screams original Spanish-American War .30-40 Krag ammo belt. Somehow 'only $395' is a bit mild. Condition, of course, is everything, but your buddy's belt is in near mint condition. Tell him to not even think about doing anything to the buckle. Excessive force would be authorized. Up to and including a stick with a nail in it. snicker.
http://www.19thcenturyweapons.com/11...5loopbelt.html
"...wasn't a lot of fake stuff back then..." Lots of assorted reproduction stuff. You could buy a solid brass CSA buckle at any flea market.

[RCS]

The cartridge belt has 45 loops, 45-70 fits nice but so will 30-40 !

[sdkrag]

There may have been a lot of Civil War stuff, which seems to have been more popular, but not a lot of Indian War or Spanish American stuff. I started re-enacting in the late 70's and had to use a lot of original equipment just because there wasn't a lot of reproduction available. Uniform cloth was nearly impossible to find. ten years later the situation was changing. Today you can find tons of high quality uniforming and accutremants all over. Nice for re-encting, tough on the collector.

[5MadFarmers]

The original Mills belts have the loops woven into them. Cheaper belts had them sewn on. Russell also had the ability to weave them. I haven't checked them but am now curious - are the reproduction ones woven or sewn?

The Mills company was sold to the Brits after WW1. The last "Mills" cartridge belts are WW2 MECO ones made for the US. Still woven.

[John Sukey]

Wasn't really sold to the Brits, Mills just opened a factory over there. Had a bloody hard time convincing the War Office that webbing was better than leather equipment.
Going back to the Boer War,Mills provided cotton bandoliers for that. Now we all know a bandolier is only meant for ONE TIME use. BUT due to shortages they were used over and over. The result being ammunition was falling out of the cheap cotton and the Boers often resupplied themselves by following behind British columns

Oh by the way, given the colour, that belt is definetly Span Am.

[5MadFarmers]

I'll split the difference with you John. Anson Mills. Serving US Military officer who perfected his belt while on duty. Per the 1883 Statute he technically couldn't profit from the US government as, in order to get the patent, he'd have to assign them free usage. His solution was simply to put the company in his brother-in-law's name (Orndorff). Leather promotes verdigris and that was what inspired Mills. Leather promoted verdigris and sewn belts didn't hold up. He had the loops woven integral to the belt. Much stronger.

The doom of the Mills company was twofold - the M-1903 and WW1. Yes, they opened a British arm to support the adoption of the gear by the Brits. Pattern 1908 wasn't it? By that time the writing was already on the wall for the US parent - Mills sold his interest. $12,000,000 is the number which comes to mind. The M-1903 used clips and thus the loops weren't needed. Due to a number of factors the woven Mills belts survived into WW1. The great expansion of WW1 forced the ordnance department to buy sewn belts. Mills and Russell wove them but Plant Brothers and Long, among others, simply sewed them. The cost of the sewed belts was significantly less and they held up as well. The last dated Mills equipment, in US service, that I am aware of is 1919. I'm going to say "1928" as that springs to mind. The remainder of the US arm was sold to the Brits. The Mills company survived in England to at least 1972. So, yes, they opened a factory there. They were also sold to the Brits in the end. During WW2 all US belts were sewn (various makers but they're all different from the WW1 ones) with the only woven belts being supplied under "reverse lend-lease" by MECO in England. Mills Equipment Company, LTD.

Back to the SpanAm belts. I was curious, never having seen one, whether they were woven as the originals were. One is up on eBay. 390297221635. From what I can see the loops are sewn - not woven. So the answer is "nope" to the woven question.