Search:

Type: Posts; User: Dick Hosmer; Keyword(s):

Search: Search took 0.01 seconds.

  1. Replies
    39
    Views
    17,403

    I'll look forward to seeing them! Of course, I've...

    I'll look forward to seeing them! Of course, I've seen/handled 86 before, when it was in the collection of the late Graham Burnside, whom old-timers will remember as a very prolific author in the...
  2. Replies
    39
    Views
    17,403

    I'd enjoy nothing more! I STILL plan to visit you...

    I'd enjoy nothing more! I STILL plan to visit you if my wife's health improves (and she does seem to slowly be getting better) while our grandson is in med school in Lincoln.
  3. Replies
    39
    Views
    17,403

    Unfortunately, to be nit-pickingly (is that a...

    Unfortunately, to be nit-pickingly (is that a word?) correct, Chuck's response perpetuates the mis-description mentioned above. The hammer does NOT drop to "half-cock" which would be a restrained...
  4. Replies
    39
    Views
    17,403

    As an aside, the "locking action" which IS...

    As an aside, the "locking action" which IS clumsy, and often mis-described, was also used on the 10,000 1871 "Army" models made by Springfield, though with a more normal hammer.
  5. Replies
    39
    Views
    17,403

    Well, it could be - but the original block would...

    Well, it could be - but the original block would have been for .50-70. Looks like a nice specimen.
  6. Replies
    39
    Views
    17,403

    Does it have the wooden block inside? Bored for...

    Does it have the wooden block inside? Bored for 18 rounds, and sloped so that heads don't overlap.
Results 1 to 6 of 6