Thank you for your appreciated inputs, 👍
Type: Posts; User: ziomanno; Keyword(s):
Thank you for your appreciated inputs, 👍
Hi Mike, lot of infos here, tanks!
Actually, I've seen some rebuild signs, and I could live with it; but if the parts are faked, I think I will pass.
Bolt number is 11, while the slide could be...
And finally the stock.
Thanks in advance.
More pics
Hello to you all; just spotted a NPM carbine that has the wartime features. I doubt she is exactly as issued in '44, but the parts, at least, seem to be correctly marked.
Would you please take a...
Thanks Brian, nice inputs; I'll try to get more pics from the seller.
This is the same pic above, just bigger
Good point here; thanks Tuna
Well, this is the question; is this sight consistent with WWII Inland production? I have to exclude a US arsenal postwar refurb. But it is also true that no more US paratroopers were in Italy after...
I would like to know your opinions on this carbine; I'm not an expert, but I find some early features (stock, barrel band) among late ones (type III rear sight).
Any help/imput will be really...
Hello to you all from Italy;
I've been offered to swap a matching K98 with a M1A1 Inland carbine in the 5.260.000 range with 6/44 barrel.
I got few pics, not really detailed, but by them I...