fake or real ??

[mannparks]

it doesesn't look right to me.
http://www.proxibid.com/asp/LotDetail.asp?ahid=3786&aid=47410&lid=12184267#

[4F4Nam]

Looks okay to me.

[m1ashooter]

Looks like a reproduction to me.

[DRB]

Pictures are not good but I would say repop about 99.9% sure it is not real.

[Bayonetman]

Agree that this is one of the current reproductions. Lousy photos and none of the other side mark which is a dead giveaway. I believe it is the IMA collector version see at http://www.ima-usa.com/militaria/edged-weapons/bayonets/u-s-m1-garand-rifle-bayonet-m-1942-long-version-16-collector-grade.html

[Tom in N.J.]

Clik on the arrows to see the other pics of the other side...reproduction for sure.

[4F4Nam]

Clik on the arrows to see the other pics of the other side...reproduction for sure.

Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh..........Soooooooo.......... Now I see. So they are actually "antiquing" the "repros"?

[Hecklerusp45]

Is it just me, but is the color of the scabbard off a little on the repos?

[Dan Shapiro]

Wouldn't be surprised if they were "aging" the scabbards as well.

[Sean P Gilday]

Fake

Fuller is indistinct near crossguard, sort of peters out when it should be sharp transition.

Beginning of edge near crosguard should be rounded, not the squared off K-Bar style we see.

Reverse cogwheel marking not US